kevinjoseph
"Sessions camps" doesn't quite have the same ring to it. And Sessions would just be another politician if Trump hadn't appointed him US attorney general. I think he was even deemed too racist or homophobic to be approved to a federal judge position he was nominated for. Also, I have what is called an "Obama phone," even though Reagan initially proposed the idea of providing cheap and free telephones and telephone service to those who really needed it, so "Reagan phone" or maybe "Ronnie phone" would be more appropriate? People initially called the ACA the Obamacare Act, in an attempt to denigrate it, but it is pretty well known that Mitt Romney first initiated a very similar idea at a more local level, but "Mittcare" sounds like some product you'd see on an infomercial, "Romneycare" doesn't sound very appealing either, at least to me.
I try to avoid politics when appropriate. It is becoming harder and harder every day for me to do that with a clear conscience, with our current US and global political climate. Switzerland was technically neutral during WWII, but Swiss banks are documented to have financed the construction of Auschwitz and other concentration camps. While I am sure that Swiss banks financed the Allied war effort just as much as Nazi Germany's, I believe that if you don't pick a side and try to remain neutral somehow, you eventually end up aiding the side you disagree with in your silence. Just an opinion. Also I specifically posted this in the philosophy and debate section so that those who wish to avoid politics could do so.