Random Thought of the Day

[Doseone]

@Nyctophilia
DEBATE ME!



I guess I should post my spotify wrapped here as I'm not active on any other social media. I'm a long time last.fm user, so I already knew all of this. Although, spotify omitted The Beatles for some reason. They were my number 2 most listened.

2023wrapped_summary-share.jpeg

Why is it so big? I don't care enough to resize. lol.

Bubblegrunge, eh? I definitely need to find more artists from that genre. Night School is the only band that comes to mind. Maybe Great Grandpa. Also, I was top 1% for time listened.

I also started physical therapy today (Which I should have been doing years ago; I've just been dealing with back pain like an idiot. lol). If therapy doesn't work, I guess I'm going to have to try injections or radiofrequency ablation. I'm sick of back pain. Sometimes when I'm sitting down for a long time I can't get up because the nerve is being pinched. I have to maneuver my way up.

[Nyctophilia]

Alex playing with Tool? I'm so jealous I should move to Toronto

#not me thinking about moving to canada to increase my chances of seeing one of them lol
#maybe some conference or research trip will take me there 😅
#the instrumental from a passage to bangkok? *envious sigh*
#great to see that he's performing though!!
#i would've fckin died if i was there tbf
#dustnroses.txt
#rush band
#prog rock

That is pretty cool but... Wait are TOOL on tour? Interesting.

Uh I hate how huge the venues they play are though because they're so famous. They're all arena gigs. I managed to see A Perfect Circle at a medium sized venue because for some reason they're less famous I guess? They were good live too. I've wanted to see TOOL for ages though and missed them last time due to covid and also wanting a smaller venue but let's face it that's not going to happen.

And omfg the sections closest to the stage are like 400+ pound tickets. Also like the cheapest ones are still 100 pounds~



I was so close to the stage for A Perfect Circle and they were like reasonably priced tickets from what I remember. How is there such a gap lol? They have many overlapping band members.



Um can you do what Steven Wilson does with Porcupine Tree and play TOOL songs at A Perfect Circle concerts?



Just like play Schism and Lateralus maybe?





and Vicarious:



Mostly just cause it pops into my head when thinking about society all the time haha.

No?

They have multiple concerts in the UK so might go to a different concert.

*goes to TOOL gig* *realises they're really great* *gets depressed concert is over like with Porcupine Tree* *buys ticket for another date that is ridiculously expensive and second hand*

It won't happen cause money but I know something like this will happen lol.

[Nyctophilia]

I like this track:



This has nothing to do with the rest of this post. I just wanted to fit that in somewhere.

Why do conservatives hate Barbie and Taylor Swift so much?

They hate successful women

They hate everything lol

Yeah, I never got this. Conservatives are so obsessed with men wearing suits and pants, but seem to have no problem with women wearing what would traditionally be men's clothing.

I wonder if they just hate femininity entirely. Like, nobody can be feminine. Not even women.

I'm sort of fascinated by this dynamic honestly now. Like the conservative hatred of femininity that even most liberals don't acknowledge they have. Because you think of like conservatives as being associated with the trad wife stereotype and they complain about masculine women occasionally (mostly aesthetic masculinity but even then not as much.) So on a superficial level it seems like they have a problem with femininity in men but support femininity in women. But! They don't!

And Western Christian culture is weird because you have all these crossdressing female saints who granted sometimes were killed for crossdressing, but then they changed their mind later (they also don't like strap on sex lol. I wonder why,) and there are stories about women crossdressing to sneak into various armies, to join the navy and sometimes to become monks or something, and they use these stories now and then to promote war and patriotism (and also asceticism.) But there are no positive stories about crossdressing or androgynous men. They are serial killers and villains and horror movie characters. I think Rachilde is one of the few people who ever subverted that trend in the West lol (in Monsieur Venus,) so the masculine woman is the sadistic villain and the feminine guy (works as a florist of course lol,) is the victim.

You also see a lot of [BEEP] people and women write characters like this too in their fiction because they are conflicted about themselves and people like themselves.

When Clive Barker adapted the novella into the 1987 film Hellraiser, he referred to the character in early drafts as "the Priest" but the final film gave no name. The production and make-up crew nicknamed the character "Pinhead"?derived from his bald head studded with nails[8]and fans accepted the sobriquet. The name was then used in press materials, tie-in media, and on-screen in some of the film's sequels, although Barker himself despises the moniker.[9]

Pinhead is one of the leaders of the Cenobites, said to be humans who were later transformed into demonic creatures blindly devoted to the practice of experimental sadomasochism. They exist in an extra-dimensional realm that is Hell or one of many versions of Hell that co-exist. Cenobites are usually only summoned to Earth through puzzle boxes, such as one called the Lemarchand Configuration (known as the Lament Configuration in the film series).

In The Hellbound Heart, Pinhead is described as an androgynous being with a feminine voice.[10][11] In 1987's Hellraiser, the character is portrayed by English actor Doug Bradley, who went on to reprise the role in seven subsequent Hellraiser films. In Hellraiser: Revelations (2011), Pinhead is played by Stephan Smith Collins, with Fred Tatasciore providing the character's voice. In Hellraiser: Judgment (2018 ), he is played by Paul T. Taylor. In the 2022 film, the character is portrayed by Jamie Clayton.

In the Hellraiser film series, Pinhead was once British soldier Captain Elliott Spencer, who became disillusioned with life and humanity during his experiences during World War I, leading him to summon the Cenobites and join their ranks. In Barker's Hellraiser comics published by BOOM! Studios, it is implied that Spencer was not the first Hell Priest or Pontifex and indicate that others will be recruited to fill the role if he ever leaves or is destroyed.[6] Additionally, Barker's novel The Scarlet Gospels indicates that there is debate on whether there has always been one Hell Priest existing for many millennia, or if the title and nature of the Hell Priest has been adopted by many different humans-turned-Cenobite across the centuries.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This is very important.

Many years ago I watched the TV show Once Upon a Time and this was a really bad show imo, mostly bad/cheesy writing, some not great acting - not my cup of tea in general and then the effects were off puttingly bad. Like the visual effects and all of that unfortunately. Also I stopped watching I think around season 4 or something. But the character Rumpelstiltskin who is a anti-villain on the show (and is several characters mixed together Rumplestiltskin, Beast from Beauty and the Beast and I think others,) had a pretty interesting backstory I thought (involving war.) I guess this is spoilers (just copying and pasting this from some wiki lol):

Spoiler: Abandoned by his father, who goes to Neverland and becomes Peter Pan, and mother Fiona, Rumplestiltskin is raised by spinsters. He eventually marries a woman named Milah, and they live a happy life together. Rumplestiltskin is then chosen to join their army and fight against the ogres. Close to the battlefield and now a soldier, Rumplestiltskin is assigned to guard a seer, who is locked in a cage. However, the seer tells Rumplestiltskin that he will die when the soldiers ride cows to battle. Rumplestiltskin doesn't acknowledge what the seer is saying, until he discovers that "cows" are a slang term for leather saddles. Fearing death, Rumplestiltskin grabs a hammer and breaks one of his legs with it so that he will go home. But when he returns home, Milah expresses disgust at Rumplestiltskin's cowardice and starts taking regular trips to the pub where she hangs out with a crew of pirates. Milah eventually abandons Rumplestiltskin and their son Baelfire for a life of adventure as a pirate. Rumplestiltskin is known as the village coward, until Baelfire is suddenly at risk of being forced to join the war. Rumplestiltskin steals a dagger tethered to the Dark One, summoning Zoso.

However, when the Dark One provokes him, Rumplestiltskin stabs him to death, which unknowingly transforms him into the Dark One. Now radiating with dark magic, Rumplestiltskin kills the soldiers that are sent for Baelfire and ends the war. However, he begins exhibiting murderous and sadistic behaviour, which concerns Baelfire. Asking the Blue Fairy for help, Baelfire gains a magic bean which he uses to open a portal so that he and Rumplestiltskin can travel to a land without magic where Rumplestiltskin won't be the Dark One. However, Rumplestiltskin clings to his power and abandons Baelfire, who is sucked into the portal. Immediately regretting this decision, Rumplestiltskin vows to find his son no matter the cost. Stealing the ability of foresight from the seer he met during the war, Rumplestiltskin discovers that the daughter of a woman named Cora will help him find his son. He trains Cora's daughters Zelena and Regina, but when Zelena gets overly jealous that Rumplestiltskin is still training Regina, she leaves and Rumplestiltskin dedicates himself to turning Regina evil. Regina eventually casts the Dark Curse which sends everyone to Storybrooke, including Rumplestiltskin.


It's also kind of interesting that he had to be a villain. It's been a long time now but I read a lot of fanfics too at the time haha. In the Western canon characters that are less physically aggressive and more intellectual or less stereotypically masculine in some way often end up becoming these sadistic power hungry feminine villains (kind of like the witchy woman archetype, this is especially highlighted when you consider the Once Upon a Time show which also has a similar female villain - and obviously everyone headcannons her as [BEEP] and ships her with the female protagonist on the show lol.) Whereas masculine heroes even if they're a bit rough around the edges usually get like this kind of hero journey.

It's not so much a gender thing since you can get the same dynamic with two female characters like Buffy and Willow from Buffy the Vampire Slayer.



I didn't need to post this again but it's such a great intro theme.

Not the bisexual redhead witch antivillain/antihero nerd. (some combination at least.) Over and over and over and over and over lol. Fucking Lilith. I like Buffy a lot actually, it's a great TV show. But lol.

And Western culture/writers don't really know what to do with this archetype. It's a bit of more of a sympathetic archetype these days than other styles of villain. But it's still not really virtuous.

I've brought The Taylor thing up a few times recently because of that hilarious and sad video I stumbled on but it really is quite weird how much hatred Taylor Swift specifically gets from conservatives and men. Mostly conservative men.

I know this is just kind of part of their grift like this whole video:



It's to try and attract attention and money from left wing and feminine people. 'Look at me I was dragged to this thing I HATE ugh.'

But there is some kind of authentic sentiment underneath that, that a lot of people have.

Even conservative women like Ben Shapiro rule 63 gender swap liked the Barbie movie:



They even have the same eyebrows somehow.

I still haven't seen this film lol. I vaguely wanted to at one point but I just never watch films now and cba.

Maybe it's because Taylor's aesthetic isn't that far removed from the conservative white person aesthetic, but she's not married and doesn't have kids? It's probably partly that. It's ironic though because this guy in the Taylor is cancer video was complaining about how sexualised she is and really not at all compared to a lot of stuff now lol.

Also I guess it's just the topic of the month they have also spent time hating on other musicians like Lizzo and Cardi B in the past.

I know some of her fans are quite parasocially delusional but the backlash is so over the top and clearly inspired by envy at the attention she gets.

At one point in the Taylor is cancer video he actually brings up conspiracy theorists that think Taylor is part of some Satanic Illuminati agenda and I thought 'and now you're going to mention they're insane too right?'

Right?



But nope he's like 'who isn't at this point if they're famous.'

OK lol.

It's also honestly really sad to see people arguing that instead of focussing on Taylor Swift they should focus on the increasing suicide rate and people dying in other parts of the world. Why must people constantly focus on depressing stuff that they have little to no control over? People do that a lot (it's actually how most people's brains work - they fixate on negative stuff by default,) but how is that a good alternative use of time lol? Perhaps not thinking about those things all the time might reduce the distress and anxiety that a lot of people experience now? Maybe Taylor Swift concerts and random speculation is something that makes them feel better?

Also he mentioned in that video that he has a girlfriend and all his videos are about criticising 'modern women' it's sad. But it's obviously working for him so I'm glad he says he dislikes masculine women but is attracted to masculine women - he said he was complaining about Taylor Swift with his girlfriend and she said how if she dated anyone she'd have his balls in her purse because she's very rich. I'm picturing a relationship dynamic where she has to conform to all his preferences and opinions or just does naturally anyway - Masc4masc vibes haha.

When people do this though they don't seem happy. Does anything in this world give you joy? Like anything? Ever? These kind of men aren't sharing that on their social media accounts haha. It's not even like lots of whiny stuff and occasionally posts about interests it's like 90% whining about women and 10% whining about something else.

I don't use instagram but people keep posting screenshots of Geddy Lee and Alex Lifeson's messages to each other on Tumblr lol.... Kind of cute:

LOOK AT THESE TWO 😭🥺❤️

#i saw this like 📸📸📸📸📸📸📸📸📸📸📸📸📸📸📸📸📸📸📸📸
#THEYRE INSANE
#IM INSANE
#i screamed irl
#old man yaoi is alive and well
#rush

I just find the juxtaposition of all of this kind of amusing I don't know.

The internet and different websites really are a thing. Tumblr is mostly adorable and twitter is a nightmare. YouTube is kind of mixed.



Uh they don't like the Taylor thing but here's the thing though... If they happen to be interested in someone/something that guys tend to like they still do feminine things like this:

It feels weird posting here after years of silence but anyways!
Allow me to introduce you to Stevie. He's my first ever OOAK doll! *hyperventilating* My initial idea was to create a doll that somehow resembles English musician and producer Steven Wilson. The result is... Since I'm not an artist and this is my first attempt to draw something on such a small face - I'm really proud of myself!

Technical specs: I used Mattel live-action Cinderella head, modified (nose carved, jawline smoothed, lips thinned), on a made-to-move Barbie body (originally belonged to BMR1959 doll in pink windbreaker, chest flattened, calves shortened), hands made by MengF from Aliexpress, feet from Creatable World doll. Clothes made by myself, guitars are from Aliexpress, coach is also hand-made by yours truly.

Stevie's prototype (the one and only Steven Wilson) was birthday boy yesterday and that fact led to this spontaneous photoshoot with very festive handmade turtleneck and even more festive Bday cupcake
The turtleneck itself was heavily inspired by the artwork of amazing innerforests, check these out!

And then you complain even more. Cause now they're 'feminising' your male/masculine stuff. Although honestly... Most musicians aren't selling stereotypical masculinity. But it does still bug some guys.

Well. Here's Stevie, upgraded (I hope).

It all started last November after I posted some photos of him on my Instagram. Some prog people appeared in comments confused what the f is this and why is it in their feed; one of them pointed out that the doll looks like JKR and boy oh boy I took this as an insult.

There was another thing I didn't like: his previous hair was rooted too thick that it created some sort of weird helmet which also couldn't lay flat without ungodly amount of hair product. I hesitated a lot because it's my first ever doll repaint and I didn't want to ruin by cutting and plucking off hair it but eventually time has come to give him some new style.

So I bought some brown saran hair online but it came too light, another strawberry blonde (I?ll use it for doll reroot eventually). Then I found the BMR1959 Tango head (her body is Stevie?s now) but her hair color was too warm. I almost quitted but then I realised that another body donor Barbie has the exact hair color I need. That was Made to Move yoga doll in green top and tie-dye leggings. Her hair was really amazing which is not so often with Mattel nowadays.

Instead of rerooting, however, I glued the hair directly onto the head. I kept them thick (personal preference) but with strands so soft it's easy to style and move them how I want. And I even made him sideburns!

So now I'm really happy with his look. Gotta make him some more T-shirts someday.

#ooak #barbie #custom doll #doll repaint #steven wilson #porcupine tree #blackfield #still not sorry

Funny conversation that I overheard at Wembley concert xD

So I would think about that before complaining about Taylor. You hate feminine people and if they all decide that the solution is to simply like the same things as you they'll move all their feminine behaviours and interests in too. Everything will be gay and babygirlified. Dolls everywhere.

Hello Kitty ak47s (lol some guy at my uni created a 3D model of one of those.) Sometimes they're doing it to themselves.

Look at what you did!





Actually keep going this is hilarious and I love it.



(I actually don't think it has much to do with them lol I think messing around with categories is just something that creative people find entertaining but conservative people find threatening you'd think they'd appreciate Taylor Swift though as she's not really that 'out there.' But they have very rigid standards I suppose.)

Posts about that like guy who's name I forgot who I think is in American horror story he has blue long hair in one pic yeah Evan Peters always some vaguely twink-adj white guy and then someone will just say something like this:

He's so lana del rey<3

What does it mean?

It occurs to me now that Lana is Taylor for edgelords. Her voice is kind of hot I thought now and then but I think they kind of ruined that for me with the memes. It's still funny though. This is her edgiest song actually:



Because video games.

I kind of want to create some kind of comedic Tumblr multiverse thing where you have like Lana and Patrick Bateman and various Paul Dano characters etc. There's just this weird lore that's developed around all these various hashtags that intersect to varying degrees. On the other hand I don't have to I can just browse Tumblr tags. I can see what she was doing now lol:



7 year old me is still annoyed that I had Ken dolls instead of 'Stevie.'

And the really weird thing is it tends to be right wing/conservative men complaining... The same people who complain when women are masculine and not into being feminine. They just want women who look like housewives, with feminine body language, but who are 100% masculine otherwise but still somehow want to get married to a masculine guy and be stay at home mums at the same time. But they should have no interests of their own. It's not really a combination that typically exists.

Bernhard finds that not only do conservative voters on average appear to strongly prefer political candidates who are masculine, male, or both, but the more conservative they are, the stronger their preferences.

Consider some of the Republican Party's popular women politicians, such as former Arizona Governor Jan Brewer or Sarah Palin, a former Alaska governor, lifetime member of the National Rifle Association and attractive soccer mom who earned a vice presidential spot on the 2008 Republican ticket with John McCain. Or think Carly Fiorina, the only woman contender in a current field of 15 Republicans vying for their party's 2016 presidential nomination, whose poll numbers soared after a televised debate highlighted by her smack down with Donald Trump.

Women and more feminine candidates may fare just fine with a strongly liberal electorate, says Bernhard, who recently presented her research at a conference of the American Political Science Association in San Francisco. Think Hillary Clinton?s often-stated identification as a grandmother early on in her current presidential bid.

"Broadly, the results seem to indicate that liberal and conservative voters use gender stereotypes quite differently from one another," she writes, adding that it is less clear whether that is due to attitudes about the proper roles for women and men, or because of a difference in views about the role of masculinity in leadership.

Bernhard says her study suggests one potential reason that more feminine Republican women may rationally choose not to run: knowing they face odds that women in the Democratic Party do not.

She theorizes that more masculine women candidates may do better with conservative voters than their more feminine counterparts because conservative voters tend to embrace more traditional gender roles and prefer that women stay out of politics. Alternatively, other studies have suggested that conservatives be more threat-oriented and favor stronger, more aggressive candidates.

On the other hand, Democrats field more women political candidates, who may benefit from stereotypes that women are stronger than men in areas such as health care or education, issues that are often key elements of Democratic Party platforms.

In a way, women candidates with the Democratic Party may have an easier road than Republican women, she says: "They don't have to walk this line between being tough and almost anti-woman to get elected by their primary base."

Conservatives generally prefer dogs, while liberals prefer cats.

Finally, of course, cats are more independent and generally thought of as "feminine" - conservatives do hate women, and especially independent ones.

I know, it's part of my cat guy test. But there are actually a cluster of things:

Research has shown that "cat people" tend to be more intelligent than "dog people." On top of that, the study found the pro-cat camp tends to be more creative, independent, and rebellious. However, the science suggests it isn't all negative for dog lovers and not all positive for feline folks either.

The cat admirers scored higher in a test for reasoning and general intelligence, plus they also proved better at abstract thought, self-reliance, and open-mindedness.

On the flip side, dog people were more likely to have extroverted and warm personalities that are very rule consciousness.

"Taken together, these findings describe the personalities of the average cat person as shy, solitary, impersonal, serious, and nonconformist, but also creative, sentimental, independent, and self-sufficient. Conversely, these findings describe dog people as grounded, pragmatic, and dutiful, as well as warm, outgoing, sociable, expressive, and group oriented," the study authors write.

You probably want a guy who likes cats but doesn't hate dogs and anyway it's more just amusing it doesn't correlate to such a high degree ime that it would be worth just judging based on pet preference alone obviously lol. Also I wouldn't recommend this test to conservative women. It's optimised for me after noticing some things because I'm the centre of the universe~ lol.



I think you should always be suspicious when there are only two options.



I think this phenomenon became clear to me when considering Katie Hopkins actually. Like she's not an unusual figure for a right wing woman and she's very masculine as a kid she wanted to be a general in the army but I think she was disqualified because of epilepsy later on, then became a businesswoman, she steals other women's husbands and brags about it, very disagreeable - trollish, psychopathic traits likes 'triggering people', very competitive, she even has short hair now I think. She had kids though so I think that's mostly what conservatives are looking for?

It's like this video lol:

"It's funny because even though she's got this notoriety she still can't get a boyfriend. At least the red pill guys are getting laid. At least. She can't even get a boyfriend that's crazy."

"All this and you can't get a husband still? That's a crazy failure."

"She's open, she's willing to let her man sleep around. She has the knowledge, she knows all the answers, but in her friend group she's the one who's not married."

"Cause red pill is not for girls. If you're not a good looking guy it has more chance of working on you, than if you're not so good looking girl"

"The reason being guys and girls don't look for the same thing. A guys not going to care that she says all- that's not what they're looking for and actually her promoting herself the way she is promoting herself is opposite of what every red pill guy wants. What she says is what every red pill guy wants. What she says is what every red pill guy wants. What she is is the absolute opposite of that. They don't want who she is. What she says is red pill who she is is not. She talks a lot, she's not obedient, she always butts heads with people. She's a career woman, she's career driven, that's not red pill. Everything that comes out of her mouth is though. So when it's gonna be time to not talk about what you do but doing what you do it's not gonna work. She's her mum."

If you're playing this game you have to get the balance right eg: shoeonhead. Obviously it helps to be conventionally attractive too and bubbly, quirky, feminine. Like what shoe does predominantly is try to empathise with men, what justpearlythings does predominantly is try to attack women combatively, this isn't a turn on because it's masculine. Her audience is very suspicious of her too because they have issues with women due to either past trauma or an overly cynical and disagreeable personality type.

I support Pearl and her endeavors but I have to call a spade a spade. It's such a female thing to do to check-out and persevere through the mire. Almost every female in red pill/man-o-sphere/conservative/right wing/tradwife arena does it. When shīt becomes a grind, the women pivot to avoid. You know what? It's fine. It's totally fine. I just want to point it out, though, because Pearl should be held to the same standards she espouses... and we should not be simps and ignore it. Sorry to pseudo-criticise, Pearl. What you're doing is excellent. Do what you gotta do but please avoid cognitive dissonance as much as you can.

If she continues pandering to you she's never going to be happy. Women who aren't retarded stop this at some point because this doesn't suit their interests and straight men don't like dating themselves.

[Doseone]

Why did God care about the animals during The Flood, but has let plenty of animals go extinct? I also remember reading something about how penguins would have had to walk/swim from Antarctica. lol. Why couldn't God just teleport these animals?

[Nyctophilia]

Getting her box blown out BBC style this is ALOT of white women id almost argue 80% of white women have dated a black guy at some point and time

I really doubt that many have. I really do stumble on these kind of comments a lot. So I got curious and started googling different things to try and find studies on racial territorialism etc - was curious if anyone had started to research this topic given the mass obsession online over the past decade, but just ended up reading a bunch more posts I stumbled on on various subreddits lol... I guess mostly by Americans. It's like the most lost people imaginable.

They have absolutely no idea what women want especially white women.

I was almost a red pill once but the blatant racism and sexist nature of the group drove me away.

Some examples of the racism: because I a black man do well with women they'd call me a Tyron, or they just say "women just wanna try black cock". Etc. It totally disregards the fact that I just know how to talk to women.

When they see an attractive white woman with a black man they say "there goes a future single mother"

Why are they so insecure if the red pill is supposed to elevate their game?

The hyper-masculinization of black men has done a ton for their community. Why is there not a single Asian man on Love Island, please answer this?

It really hasn't honestly. Any black guy who doesn't fit the hypermasculine stereotype is now at a disadvantage and since the hypermasculine stereotype doesn't appeal to most women dating site statistics show, predictably, that aside from black women black men get the least responses.

So some guys on one subreddit were talking about using porn to try and change the stereotype of Asian guys as being 'sexless' etc lol:

But it's a powerful social engineering tool. It's pumped out in mass and offered for free for a reason. And the masses definitely watch a ton of porn and have their world views influenced by it. Do you guys understand just how vulnerable the brain is to reshaping based on experiences, ideas, images etc. associated with orgasm? Extremely effective way to leverage neuro plasticity.

We'd be idiotic not to push AMXF porn. And for such media, we ought to cherry pick the most well endowed, attractive AM possible to star in them.

This mentality is dumb too really since a lot of porn - and certainly the kind they're all talking about - doesn't appeal to most women it appeals to men because it's designed for men (some guy tried to point this out and got massively downvoted lol.) It's even more dumb if you're looking for a serious relationship since the vast majority of women do not base their relationship preferences on hardcore porn (also they watch a lot of lesbian porn when they do watch porn, even when they identify as straight.) So in this case Asian film and music industries (dramas, kpop, other media etc,) are much more effective than this weird porn idea would ever be. Also YouTube.

The porn thing at best will give white guys another inferiority complex to obsess over for no reason like a bunch of them do with black guys lol, while changing nothing materially for Asian guys.

edit: Also straight guys will write stuff like this while trying to promote their appeal to women but it's just so gay.

I'd rather see Asian dudes embrace what makes them unique instead of copying that obnoxious "gym bro gigachat behavior" that a lot of white guys emulate.

Yup most people don't even want white guys to do that.

Something i've noticed is that Black People (especially men) spit out truth when it comes to gender relations while most White People dress everything up in pretty little lies.

You notice this in music too. You got Chris Brown with "These hoes ain't loyal", Kanye with "Golddigger", Wash with "Can't trust thots", and the whole genre of [gangsta] rap. Meanwhile white dudes are only writing sappy love songs begging for attention or talking in very blue pill ways.

That's because white girls are so used to being coddled they can't stand anything else.

That's how you attract most women yeah. I actually prefer white male gaze music to gangsta rap though:



'Rape the limbless cadavers'

But I have a weird sense of humour.

I don't listen to Cannibal Corpse unironically though lol. Prefer melodeath, gothic metal, folk metal, nu metal, alternative metal, depressive suicidal black metal and Arch Enemy. (Just giving them their own category lol.)





Metal bands make pretty good rock music too sometimes.



'White dudes are only writing sappy love songs'

That's very funny.





I actually think most prog rock music is about topics unrelated to romance and sex. There's also tons of political music floating around.

I can't go down this route though I'll end up posting way too many music videos lol.

I'm pretty sure a lot of white girls love Kanye.

They love cancelling him these days lol.

You can tell how threatened a man is by another man's sexual prowess by how he reacts to a woman of his tribe dating him. White, Hispanic and Arabic men get super butt hurt when their women date black men, that's why there is so much venom for women with mixed race children around these parts. Asian men interestedly get the most upset at their women dating white men hence r/hapas.

Well if they're going to get upset in the first place (which is pretty cringe,) it'd probably make more sense to focus on the next group they're most likely to date and marry etc after their own race. Which would be white guys for Asian women.

Some white guys on the other hand, especially in the US, have adopted a more fascinating approach. Ignore that white women rarely marry men of other races in the first place (and I think white people are like the least likely group to do that,) ignore that 51% of interracial marriages in the US that include white women are with Hispanic men. Fixate on black men ???

Yup.

You missed one thing: Black men have benefited from hip hop culture/media GREATLY when it comes to women. Imagine if an Indian guy came up to a girl and said this like a black guy would:

"Hey girl, I don't wanna be disrespectful or nothin', but I jus wanna say that behind is POPPIN' in them jeans! Damn girl! U sweatin' a [BEEP] up in here. : ) : )"

I don't know how it's possible to be this confused. How are they posting these things unironically lol?

Are most women not sexually attracted to their partners?

Women say all the time that most men are unattractive and ugly, mostly on reddit, youtube, twitter etc. Redpillers also claim women are sexually attracted to the top 20% of men (A lot of people claim that it means top 20% of men are dating 80% of women but that's simply not true, and I'm sure very few men claim the same), a lot of studies on dating apps states the same, some even claim it's 95-5. So it seems that a lot of women agree with redpillers on this one. A lot of women also claim women are more beautiful than men on average.

Possibly, I don't date now. I don't think physical attraction was the problem for me though, or even attraction in general, it's just easier to be attracted to people from a distance + I became less attracted to people in general over the years. My most intense crush was just on a guy from an anxiety site and he was physically attractive (my attraction was actually solely based on that to start with,) but probably not top 20% of men, but it's not like I view things in those terms to be able to say.

Then you could say that irl there are plenty of average or below average men in relationships. And that's where my confusion comes in. Why? If women clearly think that these dudes are unattractive then why be in a relationship with them? Yes his personality might be okay or even great, might be funny, charming etc but is he sexually attractive to her? The common answers I see are that he makes her laugh, he makes her feel safe, yes I'm not denying that, but isn't that settling? Will he ever turn her on like an attractive man would? I live in a country where arranged marriage is the norm so I have no doubt that there aren't any sexual attraction between most of the married couples I see (despite being one of the most densely populated country in the world lol). But what about the west? Arranged marriage is definitely not the norm there so how does it make sense?

I guess they probably are sexually attracted to them because when I realised it wasn't working with my ex's I broke up with them after several months. But there were so many complicating factors that weren't just tied to sexual attraction.

The overwhelming amount of evidence suggests that women aren't attracted to the average looking men. "Well women's sexuality is different and they value personality more", well if you talk with attractive men you'd know that women can be unhinged when they are attracted to someone. Women go crazy over kpop dudes, they go bonkers for someone like Chris Hemsworth, Tom Hiddlestone, Henry Cavil. They even go crazy for attractive criminals, serial killers etc. So they clearly are attracted to looks and appearance, most of them anyway.

Yeah but what women find physically attractive varies a bit more and the women who are attracted to serial killers are often hybristophiles, so they're not just turned on by looks they have a paraphilia. Plus you could argue with most of these guys that there are other factors besides physical appearance.

No they're not and unfortunately most men don't even realize it. That's probably 80% of marriages since the beginning of time. That's why marriage rate is sharply down and will continue. Women make their own money, healthy social networks, and can [BEEP] good looking men whenever. No reason for them to lock down with someone they only love as a friend or brother.

Well there's one of two hypothesis that make sense to me:

1. Women actually weren't involved in mate selection to the degree that people think and so now that they have freedom of choice they don't find most men attractive because they didn't select them. In which case men historically kind of fucked themselves but it will fix itself in a few generations if mostly attractive people reproduce.

2. There's something you're supposed to be doing but aren't (I think it's playing music,) and most women don't know what it is (it really seems to be music though,) because knowing is evolutionarily destructive. (Are women birds?) And that makes sense because predators pretend to be attractive people so you don't want to give men advice they're 'supposed to know.' And/or knowing is part of the test.

I think this is why you can't generally share tips:



Throughout this video where he pretends to be quirky and awkward he just blatantly lists off a bunch of stuff he's read that women find attractive. And he tried this with a bunch of different women. I might be remembering wrong and it might have been some other guy but possibly this was the person who slapped someone who actually did meet up with him as some kind of test to see how well they tolerate abuse....

The ol' Dennis Reynolds strat

It is a lot like him actually lol yeah.

It's not that "weird" when you realise that it is all calculated, the guy pobably has a list called [Things women like in men] and he tries to fit all of it in as talking points to make himself seem "perfect", but since the guy is not real in the way that he is describing, most people can tell that he is waaaaay off.

I fear for the day that he gets someone on the hook that can't tell the difference tho, if it hasn't already happened.

Absolutely and if I'm remembering correctly he did but thankfully his next step didn't work. The worst part is I don't know if he's faking the neurodivergent ADHD/autism self monologue or if he just happens to have one of those disorders too. Like it's weird to think even that is part of his act because he saw it in her bio......

As someone with ADHD, I can recognize his "stream of consciousness". That's exactly what he's doing. I also go on tangents with branches of loosely-related ideas, and mist people with ADHD do. Granted most of us have FAR more self-awareness and get carried away in a conversation of interest with someone we know, not a hostage. At the end he even says "I got the impression you're a fellow NEURODIVERGENT person", thus admitting he identifies as ADHD/Aspergers. That's weird in itself because "neurodivergence" is not something you'd expect to be dropped in a first-time, unsolicited conversation, and could likely insult the other people by implying they probably are too from a bio!

**Self-awareness of my lengthy tangent, but felt it was relevant**

It is quite convincing yes but considering everything else is scripted and bs that probably was too.

it's strange cause his voice actually sounds pretty fluent and confident, but the stuff he's saying.. it's like he is just saying everything that goes through his mind, and not just thinking it

Yeah it's quite unusual for the content of what he's saying and made me more suspicious tbh.

I was just going to comment that his voice... ACTUALLY sounds sort of attractive? But yeah this entire thing is just... God, creepy-

I'm sure he knows that and that's why he sent a bunch of audio files.

Also at one point he says he hates cats but loves dogs but he's way too weird to not like cats. So he failed the test.

I think female attraction is multifaceted so and previously people thought there was no visual aspect but now they know there is. Looks is not enough for women to be have sex or want a relationship with a man.

Uh it was for me but I'm non-binary.

I'd be curious to see this study, not that It would change my mind.

You can bring a woman to orgasm (pretty easily) by just physically stimulating her down there (trying not to be vulgar) while you talk dirty to her in her ear, and her eyes are closed.

Good luck ever bringing a dude to orgasm while his eyes are closed with a hand job just by dirty talking to him. He will want to open his eyes loom at the girl and ideally have intercourse.

To say women and men are equally visual with regards to sexual attraction is incorrect and dumb.

Well I don't think his eyes were closed most of the time but I was usually fully clothed and giving him handjobs. I even managed to get him to have an orgasm while talking about him having sex with the abomination from WoW. Which I'm realising if I never have another relationship will actually be my favourite sexual memory. Well I don't think he came while I was talking about that (or I don't remember,) but he stayed hard. Impressive honestly.

I should have done stuff like that more. This is why I like masochists haha.

*on my deathbed*

'I should have tortured more men.'

2edgy5me.

[Nyctophilia]

The thing I'm describing by 'good sex' might be different than what others mean. But here, it means something like 'losing yourself in the experience'. When I look back on sexual experiences I consider great, they all have the commonality of me sort of becoming the sex, if that makes sense? Like I'm no longer Aella's brain, doing thinky things, I am Aella's body, doing orgasmy things. I've lost the plot, I don't remember what the plot was, I'm just sexcreature emitting a constant stream of noises.

And so in a sense I'm describing a guide to get a woman (vaguely similar to me) to become a sex body.

Unfortunately this is not a guide for men themselves to become sex bodies in the same way, I'm sorry. This is a pretty heteronormative guide, and it centers on vaguely active-male, receptive-female styles of interaction, where the advice for both sides is not symmetric. If you're a subby guy really looking for a lady to take control and like it, this probably won't be the guide for you.

Yeah but actually I'd be interested in reading that guide because I'm curious but also looking for potential ideas of how to turn myself on + also since I'm turned on by male masochism + submissiveness but I have the completely wrong personality type for that sexuality (or any sexuality really, there's lots of shame and repression etc,) but I also have no self confidence. So even if I'm not thinking of myself as evil and/or being disgusted it seems impossible. My thought process is almost always counterintuitive.

And also all these posts are paywalled damn.

[Nyctophilia]

I'm looking at this chart with a bunch of fetishes people have rated in terms of how taboo they felt they were to society + how many people were into them (I'm guessing this is just straight people but I don't know, and some stuff is illegal,) and people have actually rated brother-brother incest as more taboo than mother-son which is really weird to me. They've also rated brother-brother incest as very taboo so there's a lot of taboo stuff that they've rated as less taboo than it. I'm guessing most people assume society is very homophobic but I would have thought anything with parent-child would be more taboo than siblings. Not to mention two guys can't reproduce.

Why do people think being eagerly begged is more taboo than spanking and light bondage? Also why is being eagerly begged more taboo than being sexually worshiped?

There's a lot of confusing stuff here lol.

They have gender ratio of people into the fetishes too so despite the stereotypes about white women it turns out men are more into horses lol. Women are into dragons a little more though.

Also brother-brother incest is preferred by women. So is father-son. I read a story like that as a teenager but I was more into the idea of this boy moving next door to the creepy twins who were creepy twins than the incest. I'm not really into incest stuff in porn (that also wasn't something I used to get off lol just like you know a romantic story about the creepy twins. I feel like they were emo too or my brain remembers them that way. It was the 2000s and whichever edgelord teen girl probably wrote that story probably wrote them to be emo-adj at least.)

Sister-sister and mother-sister incest which are both seen as much less taboo (or people think other people they are less taboo) are preferred by men. I feel like that's not fair and this is just saying male homosexuality is more taboo than female basically. I mean that's assuming people's perception are correct and whatever lol. Although mother-son incest is a bit more taboo than sister-sister and mother-daughter so it's also a thing about guys even then though these are all sort of close to each other and brother-brother and father-son is way off near more severe things lol. Well it's all subjective I guess.

Women are slightly more into pegging than men (which goes against things I've heard from men but doesn't really surprise me either,) slightly more into women with penises which I wouldn't have thought (actually it's basically neutral? uh 1-1.5 times more popular with women, it's hard to tell the subtle colour shades lol,) but at the same time doesn't really surprise me (I feel like people talk about men being into women with dicks more though and that they're more vocal about it,) women are more into most gender related stuff listed here (like androgyny and women without breasts, men with vaginas, I guess women are just more into trans people in this survey,) but men prefer gender transformation and sissification. Crossdressing is a very neutral one apparently and hermaphrodites whatever that means oh both sets of genitals? Yeah I'm into people with both in my imagination anyway.

I can't see either corruption or mind control as usual and those are two of my biggest ones. Are they really that unusual that she never thinks to include them in her surveys lol? There's so much stuff here. I don't see sexuality conversion there either which was a big one for me but I guess I'm not as into it atm I dunno. Most of my kinks are always related to corruption and transformation in one form or another but mostly as an adult it's gender and/or sexuality related.

Oh glasses is there though that's slightly male which is kinda surprising. I guess I'd just assume that one would be completely neutral or maybe slightly female I dunno.

I just subscribed to this channel (literally while writing this post lol,) because I saw they were wearing glasses:





They don't look like this in most of their videos and also haven't uploaded many videos lately. Tragic.

Also their original music is very good:



Back to the incredibly weird post.

Women are very into guns sexually. Rapeplay recieving is very female and rapeplay giving is very male.

I feel like the really taboo kinks listed are split 50/50 in terms of female and male preferred. The animal ones are actually mostly male preferred. The white woman thing was projection all along! No I don't know. Women are more into octopi and tentacles. Also a bunch are neutral.

Sex with your own dead body is an overwhelmingly female kink apparently. But I'm guessing there was probably like 1-5 people into that or something lol. It's just a big more taboo than brother-brother incest. Somehow.

Wait is that people having sex with your dead body or you having sex with your own dead body? Initially I imagined it as like myself having sex with my dead body which I'd prefer not to do (and also how but a lot of these are impossible so never mind lol,) along with having sex with dead bodies in general. I guess I don't mind too much if someone has sex with my dead body though as I said the other day that's pretty edgy. I don't think I'm into the idea of it in itself so much as the idea of exhibitionistically freaking people out and with minimal effort which is always a plus for me. I'm also very voyeuristic probably in relation to that. I also kind of like the idea of people with certain weird kinks. Hmm. I have mixed feelings about that one though. But I like it a bit I think. I'm going to say that's not sexual or borderline though because it's not like turning me on properly.

I'm surprised burning is such a female one. In what context? I think my brother is into sex in burning places or something like that (vaguely remember that coming up once.) We're a very normal family. Actually we very rarely talk about sex, kinks etc and only on a few occasions in the last decade.

I also like the idea of setting myself on fire to freak people out, but only if I didn't feel pain + could regenerate. Basically I just want to freak people out and also that's not sexual in this case. Doesn't do it for me.

I would be interested in seeing non-binary results but also not since I think generally she found in some surveys they were closer to female kinks? But my own are kind of mixed and I'm more interested in learning about unique sexual interests that don't fall into male or female. Like are there any very non-binary kinks.

[Nyctophilia]

You feminist who res are useless but dont worry soon you all will be killed

That was barely English.

I'm increasingly confused by the twitter rules. Not that I've ever reported anyone for anything but it seems fine to make statements like this but then Elon Musk tweeted something not long ago about how anyone making genocidal tweets will get banned or something like that but I'm guessing it's only against certain groups.

This is disturbing...

"Young men prefer playing video games over casual sex."

I also prefer video games to casual sex.

I guess it's disturbing because men are supposed to be predictable? I dunno.

Lol I just stumbled on someone who I'm 90% sure used to post on another forum I was on. He used to have a photo of himself as his avatar there too and mentions something related to that in his twitter bio plus other stuff seems familiar. I remember back then he posted that he wanted to try and make his daughters lesbians but otherwise I think he was pretty right wing and he has anti-woke in his bio now which is ironic.



She actually did the insinuation thing from It's Always Sunny:





Honestly this seems like bait but if she's serious it's probably because they haven't been dating long and she has an avoidant attachment style and/or she's not attracted to them. Actually I dunno if she's romantically connected to them it would be weird if she's not. 'Seeing' implies it is though I think.

Thinking about it she should try dating a cryptobro:

Convinced my wife to sell her engagement ring for more #Bitcoin.

Ask me anything.

Do you have a divorce lawyer?

Peak capitalism. Although his bio was like 'hold my beer' lol:

Helping the Church learn Bitcoin while Building a Movement of Jesus Maximalists to conquer the dark pagan wastelands. Join us!!!

Oh really?

That's going to be held against you someday. That's how women think. Bad move.

Depends on how good she is at larping in that pragmatic cynical mindset. Americans seem very materialistic though so it probably depends on how much money they get.

She wears no ring because we don't care about rings or jewelry

Lol, you jelly that my wife is bullish and not a vain girl who loves glitter?

😂

That sentiment would mean more if you weren't chasing bitcoin and bragging about doing this for some reason on social media. It's all very:

They are like human places but they are not within the human context. They are empty and give the impression of being infinite. Our brain thinks something is wrong.

Here me out. The meme we must popularize is Bitcoin Marriage Proposals: A man worth her hand should propose only once he's pledged a certain amount of Bitcoin (say for example at least 0.1 BTC or the equivalent to their mutual current basic expenses for a 3 month period) in a cold storage multisig wallet, or some service for this purpose. Then and only then he should dare asking her to marry him. That's the marketing campaign the diamond industry did back then and it worked like a charm. This could be the beginning of something great, that instills in couples a sense of sacrifice and commitment but also a first step for building generational wealth together with an asset that guarantees their future freedom preserving their bond. Ok #Bitcoin community make this happen

This is starting to sound like a cult.

I don't like diamonds. I am of course a cynical rootless millennial we killed that industry or something:

In June 2016, The Economist asked in a now-famous tweet: "Why aren't millennials buying diamonds?" Pithy replies included "You mean, besides the crippling debt?" and "Because you can?t live in a diamond or eat a diamond."

After all, Millennials No. 1 source of money stress is debt.

But jokes aside, The Economist noted that ?young consumers increasingly shun the taint of conflict and exploitation" -- perhaps a reason sales for De Beers and Tiffanys have dropped (11% and 4%, respectively).

Or, it might just be the fact that Millennials are delaying marriage, and therefore not buying diamond rings. The median age for a first marriage is now 29 for men and 27 for women ? more than seven years later than it was in the 1950s.

Bismuth is cooler:



But you've done the inconvincible and made diamonds more appealing by comparison to bitcoin.

It's just a symbol, and a depreciating one at that. High time preference for acquiring BTC is prudent right now, as is low time preference for trading it once acquired. Serious volatility is more likely to go up than down over the next two years. This will support their marriage.

That's really sweet.



Lol why does this exist:



This an entire meme series I guess:

[Doseone]

What if we're God living out our worst nightmare?

[Nyctophilia]

Reading a bunch of reddit threads about various sexual things again lol. I feel bad for people who are into stuff that's common in porn but essentially impossible to find irl and sometimes they don't even realise due to it involving minorities how rare it is because they don't talk to anyone from the group involved even online (or read posts/watch videos with them talking/anything really,) and they also don't understand enough about sexuality to know. So they still think it's maybe possible and basically it's never gonna happen lol.

You can't help what you're into, and I'm also into a bunch of stuff that would be impossible irl (I mean mind control is literally impossible lol. I also find it hot when guys ask to be impregnated but they can't be if they're cis guys + I don't have male reproductive anatomy. Other stuff I'm into is rare like most men want to top with feminine afab people and I don't want to bottom etc.) But it helps to know.

This is a really good example (it's kind of the reverse of my issue) he talks about how he has a fantasy of being cuckolded by a trans woman but he'd also want to be involved with her sexually:

We have found that it's hard enough to find a trans girl that is into it what I want. Most of the ones we have found want to be the bottom to a guy, and the top to the girl. I am sure there are some out there, we just haven't been able to find them... yet. Maybe someday.
And to think, we're in one of the top 5 populated places in the USA.

It's going to be almost impossible. Obviously in trans porn trans women are always topping but in reality straight trans women are almost exclusively bottoms from what I've noticed and [BEEP] trans women are usually uninterested in topping men if they're into topping at all. There are way more afab people into topping guys ime (any gender identity. There are evidently more cis women into pegging than men according to that survey I looked at yesterday lol,) or masculine cis gay men.

I see this sentiment with some trans women where it's like 'what's the point of having sex with a masculine guy if he's not going to top you?' Some are not even that into masculine guys they just like the idea of a certain kind of sexual dynamic. But then other trans women are more into men but the idea of topping makes them dysphoric or insecure and it's just not their preference. Maybe they'd do it if it was an occasional thing and meant they could be in a relationship with a guy they really like but they don't want to. That's another opinion I've seen.

I think I came across one trans woman online on YouTube who identified as asexual and said after going on hrt her preferences changed from being exclusively into masculine guys to being into twinks, feminine guys, trans guys, trans women uh maybe cis women too but mostly into androgyny and I think maybe she expressed an interest in topping but she also said she was asexual in videos from what I remember so kind of mixed messages and deleted that video later possibly because it was too personal or she changed her mind. Or maybe getting lots of messages about topping lol. I found this very interesting though because it's a preference/sexuality I've seen a bunch of afab people - often non-binary or trans masc have and talk about. So that was very interesting to me because it seems less common in trans women.

I know there's a lot of trans women out there who are basically into femboys, trans women and cis women (and quite a lot would probably prefer trans women and femboys, but some are into cis women too,) and some of these trans women are switches but then if you're too masculine or you don't crossdress etc that group will be less into you.

Cis women who are into guys are usually into more masculine guys compared to those trans women who are often lesbian-adj when they're interested in topping (not talking about the ones who are into really masculine guys and like to bottom,) and there are cis women like that too who are into women and femboys and often id as lesbian - not talking about bisexual women this is kind of different and that is a minority. So most cis women who are into topping will be into topping guys they're into including the more masculine guys at a slightly higher rate I think. There are differences there too because trans women are expected to top with their dick whereas cis women don't have a dick so they're using a strap on. (I bet there's a cis woman out there somewhere who found a surgeon to give her a phalloplasty but you know I'm not talking about unicorns either lol.) You're still talking about a minority either way though.

I'm non-binary though and have some interest in topping - it's something I fantasise about occasionally and like in porn etc - and I think I'm probably into more masculine guys then the lesbian-adj women are (cis and trans,) but still there's a limit there and I'm very picky in general lol... It got worse with age too.

Then also cis gay men are usually into masculine guys - very masculine guys often (that's kind of a stereotype. possibly overstated but I think it's still reasonably common) - and a bunch of them are switches or like topping and a bunch of them also like topping masculine guys cause they're into masculine guys. But that's probably not what he's looking for. Like the specific combination a lot of people want is someone very feminine who looks like a feminine woman but has a dick So cis gay men won't work generally unless they're femboys and then it loops back into straight trans women's sexual preferences again where they're generally into bottoming but not exclusively though I've heard. It's hard to get numbers for a lot of this stuff because people don't do enough research. Yet it's very important. It's annoying. But in research there is a connection between femininity in gay men and preferring to bottom.

Then in this context cause it's a cuckold thing they also kind of want this person to have a dominant sort of sexuality where they specifically want to compete with men where it's like 'I'm better than you and I'm going to steal your wife but I'm feminine. Look how pathetic you are in comparison even to me I'm going to get your wife pregnant etc.' either that or they're a rare person who is scared that femininity is superior to masculinity so they're insecure about not being feminine but that's going to be very rare for a cis guy. Usually it would probably be more like 'I'm being cucked by the most feminine person with a dick imaginable how humiliating for my masculinity.' But there has to be something like that I think otherwise it's just a threesome right? I feel like there has to be that power dynamic. But I do know some people who say they're into cuckold stuff seem to be more voyeurs because the appeal is just focussing on their wives pleasure and I feel like that's a distinct sexual interest that's sperate from the humiliation thing.

So I see the appeal in that (but I don't have the equipment, and it's not really a big turn on for me anyway. It's more of a non-sexual power fantasy + it's adj to other interests I have with sexuality conversion fetish stuff + impregnation kink, can also see the appeal in like 'I'm going to turn your girlfriend into my lesbian girlfriend and get her pregnant masculine men are unnecessary' but I'm not sure if I'm interested in roleplaying that in real life anyway and I am more into the idea of turning a guy into my lesbian girlfriend atm tbh.) Some lesbian women might be into that and maybe some straight guys who are into being feminine might see an appeal in that. Some people there seemed to be OK with femboys so:

My gf wants to [BEEP] a femboy/crossplayer so thats halfway there

Yeah that sounds equally great lol

But with most of those groups they're not going to want to also [BEEP] the guy in that situation.

I really think Taylor Swift is in a great position to maximise on this dynamic. I mean it's just. They're so mad lol. Not since Justin Bieber have I seen so many rustled jimmies.

But she wouldn't be into that lol. Unless she is I don't know her but Gaylors very much want to know lmfao. (If she's gay not that fetish lol.)

So, Billie Eilish apparently came out. Here's a link with her and an adorbs Variety reporter (who identifies as LGB) flirting their butts off. So cute! 😂

Will it move the needle for other celebs, including Taylor? Maybe. Billie used the "I thought everybody knew!" line, which, if Taylor ever comes out in any form (bisexual or otherwise), I fully expect her to invoke. Like "didn't Me, Dress, or--for the love of all that's holy--You Need to Calm Down clue you in?"

That was always kind of very obvious with Billie though wasn't it?

LOL:

"No I didn't" Eilish said. "But I kind of thought, 'Wasn't it obvious'? I didn't realize people didn't know. I just don't really believe in it. I'm just like, 'Why can't we just exist'? I've been doing this for a long time, and I just didn't talk about it. Whoops."

Apparently she said in some video she was straight once though or something I dunno. I'm not super into her music because it's a bit 'dead sounding' I quite like this track though:



I also don't like some of the comments she's made about men. I always connected to her vibe though.



Also the neon green. I was really into neon green specifically when I was a teenager still kind of like various shades of green:

She's always been very lesbian coded. From her style to some of her MVs (Lost Cause), to (as others have pointed out) her filters and little flirty hints to women. I've always assumed she is bi and would eventually come out. She was SO young when she blew up so it makes sense it took her a while to get there. Everything about her style and aesthetic is very tilted toward the female gaze.

I disagree she's stereotypically bisexual. Or one of the bisexual stereotypes. You're not supposed to notice patterns though lol. Obviously they don't apply 100% of the time.

1. The dyed hair + really long hair + nails + colours. This photo lol:



2. Edgy. Satan stuff. 'I'm a bad guy':



3. The spiders:



It's all like 'I'm evil/dark triad shit.'

So either 'I'm non-binary and bisexual' or 'I'm bisexual' would be the assumption. I still don't think she's labelled her sexuality (which is fine.) Just talking about stereotypes. Like:



They're genderfluid and pansexual I think. Similar aesthetic.



You said your girlfriend wanna marry you
But now she's here with me

Tell me, tell me, who's gonna restrain me now?


Oh wait yeah she had long blue hair and worked with Grimes....

legit love hentai. have a fake twitter and insta just to look at nice illustrations beautiful naked blue hair girls.

I didn't say anything. Tbf she also said this:

Illustations of things always better than real things

That song came out 2 years after she tweeted that during the pandemic + they probably didn't even meet in person lol. It's just funny.



"Being a [BEEP] is my kink."

A lot of her lyrics are very fuckboy and always with the lyrics about stealing guys' girlfriends (see now I'm back on topic with this post actually.)

I'ma blow up on 'em
Blow up on 'em
Blow a kiss to your girl

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGEgz2cMa4c

Me and your girlfriend playin' dress up at my house
I gave your girlfriend cunnilingus on my couch
She cute, kawaii, hentai boobies, that excites me
I think she really likes me, asked politely, can I (woo-hoo)
(Ooh, woo-ooh, woo-ooh) slumber party
(Ooh, woo-ooh, woo-ooh) slumber party
(Ooh, woo-ooh, woo-ooh) slumber party
(Ooh, woo-ooh, woo-ooh) slumber party

Why is it always someone else's girlfriend Ashnikko? :')



She co-wrote this song (I wanted to say you can tell but Doja is a bit like that anyway):



Ashnikko wrote about being embarrassed by a lot of her older music and she's was writing about unpleasant ex relationships etc. It's a persona obviously but certain people lean into it a lot.

I want to say I dyed my hair and was edgy before all these people. I was an originator.



(not really though all these aesthetics go much further back lol obviously.)

Lesbians are like:





^ lol I see that finally got age restricted after all this time.







A lot more soft stereotypically. Less defensive.

And (going back to topic before derailed by Billie Eilish/LGBT culture shit) I mean I feel bad for them but also it's like good god read some posts by trans women some time or something. Cause it's not just this guy. I feel like a lot of them don't even realise that trans women are generally not into topping which is bizarre. Because you'd assume by default most wouldn't be right? Because of gender dysphoria and because most women don't like topping but OK whatever. You think trans women think like cross dressing straight men who are also open to fucking cis guys. Amazing. Definitely need sex education in school...

And this is such a common problem now but I'm not going to go on a rant about the whole "white women prefer black guys and are always cucking their white male partners because they're not masculine enough." BS again. It really grinds my gears lol.

And now we've reached the level of discourse where it's accepted by some guys that white women all want to [BEEP] their dogs. It's mind blowing.