not just here but from anywhere. and who were they?
i don't really get influenced very much. after four years on internet forums im basically unchanged. a few people have influenced me, but that was only after i got very obsessed with them. and even obsession with someone that's no joke doesn't guarantee that they will impart influence on you. there's only a range of ways you can be influenced in and that person might be out of your range of influence (i try to avoid obsessions with the people there's no chance of me being influenced by, while i direct my obsessions towards candidates who could have some influence, but sometimes i'm just too tempted to read about the ones who can't change me; sometimes it's the fact that they can't change me that makes them appealing; they're too great to ever have any influence on me but that makes them perfect for fawning over and admiring).
there's a lot said of bad influences i notice. but are people influenced badly. i don't really think so. if you join a "bad" crowd you won't be influenced by them, you'll just succumb to its vices that give it the reputation of being bad like anyone else who joins it will. to stay away from the bad influences is to stay away from the vices, and thereby away from the people who could expose you to those vices. but no ones influencing the person you are. you can always recover from the influence if you weren't too permanently damaged by the vice. that's called rehab.
and do schools influence you? richard rodrieguez says not really.
i think the outlook is just as bleak for forums with the one advantage that the *potential* to be influenced is higher (plainly because there's more people and less barriers between them).Instead, one hears proposals for increasing the self-esteem of students and encouraging early intellectual independence. Paragraphs glitter with a constellation of terms like creativity and originality. (Ignored altogether is the function of imitation in a student’s life.) Radical educationists meanwhile complain that ghetto schools ‘oppress’ students by trying to mold them, stifling native characteristics. The truer critique would be just the reverse: not that schools change ghetto students too much, but that while they might promote the occasional scholarship student, they change most students barely at all