Most children who believe that they are transgender are just going through a “phase”, the NHS has said, as it warns that doctors should not encourage them to change their names and pronouns.I can't describe how much I hate this country (and I don't mean every person in it obviously I meant the establishment.) Like when I was 12 I wanted to move to Finland and I was always wanting to leave really, mostly due to issues with bullying in school/desire to escape. But now it's just so much more personal/deeper. Listening to politicians debate your existence in parliament and there's this kind of I don't know vibe. Like this upper middle class English vibe. People with game of Thrones names too like 'baroness Nicholson of winterbourne' wtf is that? Sometimes it just feels surreal. There's even this transphobic American who kept posting positively about the English monarchy on twitter, brags about IQ and is some kind of evo-psych professor, and then admitted to being like 75% English ethnically. I mean there are other kinds of transphobes in America but this is definitely a type (and you can be culturally so even when born/raised in America!) Richard Dawkins is a similar person. A puritanical sex-negative, homophobic, transphobic, stuffy, posh elitist hellscape.NHS England says that the interim Cass Report has advised that even social transition, such as changing a young person’s name and pronouns or the way that they dress, is not a “neutral act” that could have “significant effects” in terms of “psychological functioning”.
There's no reason a futurology sub should be full of reactionaries but that thread seemed to be and even someone denying they're a conservative because... 'I'm a fascist' lol.
The battle for both is just getting started, in earnest, in North America. The UK is far ahead of us.This is actually the best argument against a nationalised health service I've ever seen. 'When your government are conservative assholes, they'll limit your options RE medically transitioning.' (I don't believe that's the primary reason though I think the culture here is generally hysterical towards things like this. Some areas of the US are equally hysterical and people face similar barriers, but some are far more open minded and have informed consent etc.)I think that is because we have the NHS.
As Zinnia Jones pointed out, they will need to engage in huge government overreach in order to stop all 'possibly vulnerable to transitioning' children and teenagers from engaging in any behaviour that could be a potential 'warning sign.'
Exactly really. But I don't think they'll be content with that so they'll attempt to introduce legislation like they did with section 28. Of course in spite of that I learnt about all kinds of things and homosexuality was definitely brought up by kids during section 28 when I was in school. Later I had a homophobic teacher who ranted about how homosexuality was unnatural and I didn't agree since I have the internet and I'm probably just not that flavour of dickhead. Teachers 0 peer interactions/personality traits/internet/media 1.Page 11/12 Social Transition, NHS appear to think “social transition should only be considered where the approach is necessary for the alleviation, blah blah, basically they think that they will decide when and how a child socially transitions. Good luck with that!
Meanwhile in Denver Catholic schools (not creepy as [BEEP] at all):
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Fg_WayWU...png&name=small
It's also worth noting that due to current stereotypes and gender roles being stricter for males they've decided that pretty much all non-conforming behaviour from males is automatically 'making an identity statement' which they think is bad, whereas genetic females who prefer wearing jeans and sports are fine. Evidently merely being socially anxious, depressed, or other wise exhibiting mental health symptoms is an 'identity statement' for genetic females though lmfao. (ableist incoherence.) Along with having any [BEEP] friends.
At least we have school uniforms here.