I seem to have caved and subscribed to Contrapoints patreon temporarily to watch that male gaze tangent video. Based on the video comments (I haven't watched it yet) it looks like she might eventually do a longer video on her channel on this topic anyway although given she basically never makes videos there now so who knows when that would come out.
It's only about an hour long but some of her descriptions plus the comments sound like it at least touches on some interesting topics:
Tbf I connect with those kind of characters a lot too despite being afab and non-binary. I do this as well but sometimes (like here,) I don't think assigned sex is that relevant.I'm AMAB non-binary person. I really resonate with your analysis of the 'identification' at around 20 mins.
That?s part of why I believe I resonated with anime as a kid. All the main shonen shows had a more androgynous male character. Often more analytic and cunning rather than brute force oriented. I think I really was yearning to identify with a version of masculinity that blended the hegemonic feminine urges I felt growing up.
"Man has beyond doubt the stronger sexual appetite of the two... Woman, however, if physically and mentally normal, and properly educated, has but little sensual desire... Nevertheless, sexual conciousness is stronger in woman than in man... But her love is more spiritual than sensual." - Richard von Krafft-Ebing.
What does that mean lol ??? I actually haven't read Psychopathia Sexualis though. I should at some point.
OK this guy she's got reading a Freud quote sounds a lot like Werner Herzog.
"I think this conflict arises because men often feel enslaved by their own desire for women and women feel enslaved by men's desire."
"I think it would be fair to say that men have a tendency to look at women and to artistically represent women in ways that many women find uncomfortable and traumatising."
Yeah I think both those sentences are accurate.
"I think that talk of an organic male sexuality vs female sexuality is probably not justified."
Obviously though right because there aren't just 2 sexualities for starters.
Oh my god that show she brought up. I hate when people conflate romance with porn. It reminds me of these guys who were doing a study on what men and women like sexually and the examples they used for women were often romance type books. I think they even brought up fucking Twilight. Maybe women on average can get off to romance? I can't and it seems weird to me. The kind of written stuff I've used for porn is very different to romance fanfiction which I also read. I can't get off to that.
Like I can enjoy reading Pride and Prejudice fanfiction and then go and [redacted] to some woman as a therapist who is supposed to be helping some guy overcome I dunno some personal issues but instead starts to brainwash him into liking dick and [redacted] with a man and then some other audios at the same by her along a kind of similar theme often she has control over the other guy as well basically she controls everyone and then in my head I kind of imagine I'm her and the other guy who is topping the submissive guy a little bit, but mostly focussed on what's happening to the guy voyeuristically. Also some sissy/feminisation stuff by her. Then I also stumbled on this guy talking about wedding vows where he was talking about how he wanted to be turned into a lesbian and some more hardcore stuff that aren't my personal kinks. It was a bit much and I wasn't that into his voice (which is important,) but it still turned me on and I liked the lesbian part and also the part where he talks about getting impregnated by her, and tattoo'd and some things like that and so then I kind of created a fantasy based around that cause I always struggle to find stuff like that tbh. I don't fantasise much now I used to a lot more almost exclusively it doesn't work as well now because my sex drive is lower I imagine than when I was a teenager but it can work rarely if I get inspired.
I didn't want to actually. I often listen to a bunch of stuff but I often end up having to go back to themes like that. Now I'm not saying most women are into that - there's probably a reason that's rare and I'm struggling to find certain things and I'm definitely not the target audio of that woman's audios either they're mostly for submissive guys I think and I'm not self inserting as the submissive guy either, but is it possible your sexuality is terrifying to you and also to men, and so it has to be hidden? Seems like a lot of women enjoy non-consensual or aggressive sex (to varying degrees,) from one pov or another.
Oh my god no she brought up Twilight when talking about female sexuality haha. To illustrate how it's visual because you get a visual description of the characters that appear in your mind's eye (unless you have aphantasia I guess.) We have to move on from Twilight as a society (Western culture (tm.))
This is what terrorists did.
I read those books when I was 19 or so and they were fine. They get unnecessary criticism from people who hate anything teen girls like but I have to say they weren't sexual or hot to me. Like Anne Rice was a bit better at that from time to time, although she could be very boring too lol in her writing.
OK so she's talking about different theories of female sexuality that exist like the reactionary one where it's complimentary to male sexuality and the opposite of that, and then a theory where female sexuality is like a kind of spiritual slow burn thing, and then a third one where she describes female sexuality as castrated but similar to male sexuality just repressed then she quotes Germaine Greer who says women should abandon romance and consume hardcore porn and then wrote a book about teenage boys and used some Swedish guy's photo without permission and he was creeped out about that and I think his sexualisation creeped him out in general from what I've heard. He was also very popular in Japan and I think inspired bishounen aesthetics which if I stop pausing this video I assume Contrapoints will actually get to LOL. Seems like she's going there.
"Obviously each of these theories are problematic though they each could be extended to some extent."
In fairness to Germaine Greer who I disagree with for so many reasons, I do relate to feeling castrated physically, culturally, sexually etc. I don't think the answer to that is for people to consume pornography they're not into though but I do think that there is obviously a constant repression of more aggressive forms of sexuality and this would be even moreso her experience because she's a lot older.
Also lol at some feminists vaguely reinventing Kant.
Not quite because he's talking about men essentially giving into their desires because you know a lot of men are neurotic about their sexuality as has been established.Kant writes that masturbation makes the agent "an object of enjoyment" and is morally worse than suicide (Lectures, Ak 27:391-92; Metaphysics, Ak 6:425).
Counterpoint:
Or not.In several studies, women who experienced more orgasms, and overall greater frequency and satisfaction with sex ? with a partner or not were shown to have greater resistance to coronary heart disease (CHD) and type 2 diabetes."
So she was arguing that straight men objectify women as a way to distance themselves and so they don't have to feel guilty about sexualising women. She then says lesbian women tend not to come to this coping mechanism because they also identify with women. I guess it depends on what you mean when you say objectify since I think a lot of my sexuality is objectifying. Possibly especially regarding women over the years. But, she lists some examples like AI girlfriends and sex dolls which I think is a poor example because some people also like the idea of that because they struggle to get into real relationships and I can see the appeal to that even. I also used AI dungeon to test sexual roleplaying years ago but it wasn't that great at it but still not bad.
Not just gay men's objectification but yeah. There are women doing this sort of thing on tumblr etc (sometimes they're trans men and non-binary too though,) and straight men hate it too. Like:"All this of course raises the question why do gay men objectify? I think part of it is that objectification isn't so often the trauma for gay men than it is for women. So gay men tend not to have quite the same complex, ambivalent relationship to objectification that women do. I also think that because masculinity is associated with power objectification of men has different implications than objectification of women. In particular a muscular man's body is not passive, soft, flesh to be preyed upon. A muscular male body is power and you see this in the almost quasi-religious attitude to male bodies that's part of gay male culture. I would even argue that gay men's objectification of men is extremely threatening to heteronormativity
I don't know if they assume the person posting that is male, or if they were, many aren't, but very obviously men have been deeply uncomfortable with yaoi etc for a long time as well. Actually it's this that basically led me to conclude that most people hate being sexualised in this particular way regardless of sex and gender.It's weird that there are so called Rush "fans" that write about fucking the best drummer who ever existed in the ass. I mean i can joke with the best of them but that is just too much. I love many female singers but never once felt the need to think about them in that way nor write about it in a so called blog. Grow up or maybe you are a deviant, whatever bro, get out of my fandom.
#rush #fake rush fans #tired of sex based bullshit
Also again I have to reemphasise that the guy complaining about this his entire tumblr blog was just sexualised images of women. I'm still not over the irony. But of course he's operating under a madonna/whore complex system where some things are sacred and some things are sexual.
Oh no she's talking about Jeffrey Dahmer as an extreme form of male objectification 'this man wanted to create sex zombies'
I know. It's disturbingly relatable like if I was a psychopath with no conscience and genetically male I'd be somewhat similar to him. I got freaked out by that years ago.
Uh we've been castrated by nature. Not what people want to hear but at this point I've stumbled on a number of anecdotes regarding trans guys sexuality before vs after where I think this may be the case. One person was really disturbed by their sadistic sexual drive and eventually went off testosterone. You also have to be psychopathic of course but you have to have the combination of being psychopathic, and being very sexually driven, not satisfied with mere fantasy + voyeurism.'I take as a serious challenge to us gender anti-essentialists the question why is there no female Jeffrey Dahmer?'
Johanna Dennehy killed because she wanted to dominate people but I don't think it was overly sexual. She did dress one guy in female clothing and had been having sex with him beforehand I think wanted to humiliate him, also created violent porn in prison I think. I still feel like that wasn't her primary motive. I think the primary motive was still showing people she was powerful so a kind of narcissism + desire to socially dominate, but I think sexuality and compulsion factored in as an additional motivation she described killing as 'moreish' very unusual case study.'It's not that women are angels and inherently non violent because we know that's not true. There's women domestic abusers, there's women serial killers but female serial killers seem to kill for different motives it's revenge or profit it's not pure dominating lust.'
Also what's her name? The one Skynd wrote a really good piece of music about.....
Katherine Knight she had multiple weird things going on and had that weird obsession with like animal slaughter etc that seems common to a lot of serial killers. Jeffrey Dahmer had that bone thing at a young age:
Katherine Knight worked in a slaughterhouse and people were weirded out by how excited she seemed to be of watching death etc. She described it as her dream job. She hung like knives above her bed and someone who knew her suggested that she saw them as kind of romantic objects. She'd been very abusive to her partners and just crazy in general for years before she killed - honestly it's bizarre that she never ended up in prison before she killed someone. She'd stabbed strangers in the street etc while angry. But I think the fact that she lost her 'outlet' factored into her deterioration over time. It wasn't just that she was mad even before she got really angry with him she'd been planning his death by like walking around and telling people she'd killed him to see their reaction. Like roleplaying it. And then I think that wasn't enough so while mad she was essentially like '[BEEP] it'From an early age, Dahmer manifested an interest in dead animals. His fascination with dead animals may have begun when, at the age of four, he saw his father removing animal bones from beneath the family home. According to Lionel, Dahmer was "oddly thrilled" by the sound the bones made, and became preoccupied with animal bones, which he initially called his "fiddlesticks". He occasionally searched beneath and around the family home for additional bones, and explored the bodies of live animals to discover where their bones were located.[17]
Basically it's like they're predators. Ground breaking stuff lol but yeah there are definitely women like that they just tend to be less successful and also often have other emotional things going on often, but like every killer is sort of idiosyncratic in certain ways even if there are overlaps.
That's the part where it's on like another level psychologically and that's the part that's separate from the psychopathy, and the hormonal element, and even objectification and general male sexuality it's like their brains are set at a very primitive kind of level? Something like that. This particular group are just really weird to me. I haven't looked into a lot of serial killers so my knowledge is superficial but I feel like someone like Ted Bundy is pretty different to like the Katherine Knight Dahmer thing where it's almost like they've regressed psychologically to a primitive form of life (I dunno actually I've never bothered to look into him much besides repeatedly hearing he seemed normal to others which certainly a lot of serial killers don't actually and I don't know where that general rumour of supposed normality came from.) Especially when they lose control of their inhibitions eg: like when being angry because Katherine Knight had BPD and had massive anger issues, and Dahmer was an alcoholic I think though he also had BPD it didn't seem as obvious to me reading about him ages ago though but he was diagnosed with schizotypal personality disorder and BPD.
When I think about it too much I start to get disturbed despite being an edgelord haha it's like staring into the abyss which is why I don't care for truecrime much generally. You can see mild forms of this all over the place like people who are into taxidermy etc. I was going to post a video of some stuff but then decided that was a bit much despite this entire post lol I dunno. Lots of interests that people have that are tangential so you can kind of see it (like with most things,) as a spectrum but then yeah it's the intersection of several extreme things. Obsessive personality + low empathy + impulse control issues caused by extreme emotional dysregulation or substance abuse + some kind of weird predator/sadism thing.