I'm not gonna lie this is pretty hot (reading Aella's tweets again lol):
society is slowly turning me into the porn jokerthe harder u try to shame me the more people i bangyea watch me go, in my own house bangin ppl i enjoy banging. watch me contribute to the downfall of society. having a great time, a week-long afterglow and affection for my sex partners. by talking about the things i enjoy publicly and without shame im gonna make rome burnmaybe a society that can be sent into angry paroxysms by the fact that i dare to live without shame is a society that *should* burn(then obviously I fell down several rabbit holes because one does not read tweets from certain accounts without doing that.)maybe i *should* be a threat to your way of life and norms and everything you love. maybe your wives should be happier than they are, maybe they should be sluts too. maybe seeing me having a great time will make them envious. maybe you should have been better at fucking her.
Also because I like to add musical references constantly this is the closest thing to a musical subtext/track for this post lol:
This was a response to that or quoting part of it from someone else:
We've been over this a miserable little pile of secrets.i think we are experiencing a resurgence of repressive sexual values for a few reasons:
[...]
3. male sexuality still isn't very liberated. female sexuality has been liberated very hard in the USA. women, their faces & bodies, their sexuality, and their words are now celebrated and plastered EVERYWHERE in america (at least, in the mainstream). modern woman, who seems to be able to do no wrong, has been elevated to a kind of superwoman status.
however, what are men?
lame, macho (bad), toxic masculine, pathetic, sophomoric, lazy, childish, underdeveloped, "needs therapy". they are largely either just "regular guys", or awful. not many "good men" out there.
that's my take. what's the solution?:
instead of attacking women and trying to bring them "back down" to some previous level, we need a similar liberation kind of movement for males, in order to elevate them to superman status as well.
Yeah this relates to a post I was going to make yesterday but this forum was down. I can only think about my own sexuality which is atypical but I don't think most guys are in any way interested in being attractive to someone like me (and there are women with similar sexualities,) and even actively find my sexuality damaging to them in some way and I find their attempts to insist I should want to be with a stereotypically masculine guy annoying (was actually reading a quora thread where every comment was basically doing that when talking about how men have become more feminine or something,) and it just makes me think of conversion therapy so at a bit of a stalemate there.imagine exploring, talking about, and being open about male sexual fantasies, desires, and fetishes again (we used to be, let's bring it back. it's not zero sum or either/or in terms of male OR female sexuality being celebrated)
imagine good looking & attractive men being as thirsted over as the hottest girls (already happening in some circles, look at male kpop)
if this seems odd to you, i will just say that from the POV of a lot of males, we feel completely boxed in. not that we want to be more feminine or something, or that we wish we could cry but it's shamed, but that we feel like everything that we naturally are is wrong, and don't see a way to fully self-actualize into the hottest, most badass versions of ourselves, that isn't seen as a complete joke
anyway, just my 2cents and one of my dreams. i've been working on ways to figure this out in a way.
I also don't think most women are actually all that comfortable being sexually aggressive or talking about their sexual interests etc. When I was growing up teenage girls wouldn't even admit to maturbating and I'm 32 so not super young but it also wasn't that long ago. I live in the UK though which is an incredibly repressed country in general. Not the US.
I don't know what they mean by talking about male fantasies/fetishes. You mean try to like them? Because that will never happen or vice versa in most cases (cause most people are horrified by sexualities that aren't compatible with their own,) but men are open enough online and it's not hard to find people talking about that stuff. I mean this isn't some new 'backlash to female sexuality.' It's been going on for thousands of years or longer but it's just more obvious with social media atm. Lots of women have always been disgusted by male sexuality and also engage in slut shaming behaviour with other women for competitive reasons (and because it works,) and many men are disgusted by promiscuous women because of their madonna/whore complex basically.
So yeah this was the thing I was going to post lol (also something else tangentially related but yeah) I was reading the comments of this guy whose audio porn I 'use':
Lol sometimes I stumble on someone and think the same thing like 'they really know how to appeal to that target audience.' Sometimes even if I'm not into them it's interesting in an 'academic' sense.Gosh, you really know what you're doing, don't you?
That?s what I thought when I listened to this, this guy knows what he's doing.
Good job !! It's nice of you to make these.
In this case I personally find this guy's audios hot and notice he pays a lot of attention to audience feedback so it makes sense.
For me though although that audio was really good cause I really like corruption (so have gone back to it multiple times,) it was actually this other one where he's playing a guy who does camming in the audio and he's seducing his shy roommate who watches his streams and there's pegging, he talks about the listener getting him pregnant, talks about how he'll think about them while doing streaming stuff, calls himself a [BEEP] after talking about wanting the listener to get him pregnant, calls himself a bunny. Then he's like 'this is much better than fucking myself for some guy named [random username.]' Not everything in that audio worked for me personally but it's impressive that he fit so many things I find hot and that are generally very niche and not popular into such a short space of time. Of course it's not that weird and mostly just the gender thing that makes it unusual but even so it's quite hard to find.
Of course it helps that his voice is cute and sort of femme-ish too.
Also he doesn't even do any of the patreon stuff other people on that level do (who probably include less of my kinks really,) like just has a ko-fi donation link which doesn't seem to work anymore it seems since I clicked on it. So basically he's really good and doing this for free. Like a public service.
It's like that time before where I was listening to some other guy's audio and he just randomly mentioned he was wearing glasses and I was like 'omg how did you know?' actually two audios I found like that from different guys but in one it was just completely unnecessary for him to bring that up and not part of the plot. That's just a coincidence I know (and also lots of people are into glasses,) lol but still.
And yeah when I was writing the above I was also thinking about how it is more impressive if guys seem to know what they're doing in this area because the idea of a guy making audio porn and then actually taking notes on how to improve is insane to me culturally. Like the vast majority of men don't seem to read erotica, fanfiction, or have any interest in genres that are popular with women. Unless it becomes big at the box office like 50 shades of grey which honestly wasn't porn and I've gone into my weird lens when thinking about that series before so not doing it again lol... (still never watched/read it.) But yeah basically men are very siloed and don't seem very good at figuring out how to appeal to women and perhaps that's 'by design' for evo-psych reasons who knows.
The kind of posts I read online are essentially often from conservative guys and so it's sort of like they devalue anything feminine people are into (sexually, non sexually, just anything that doesn't overlap with their own interests,) they have no interest in being attractive according to any standards but their own and I'm not going to complain about that because it's the same for most people in modern society but then they also insist that you're lying if you're into stuff that goes against their ego ideal which is annoying as fuck. Even if they're right in general exceptions still exist. There's also the implication that you're damaging men by having the desires that you have. Destroying civilisation etc.
Sometimes it just hits me. Why do I have to exist in this reality?
My version of Aella's tweets is just like 'OK then bye *gets off to audio porn with submissive guys hours later.*'
The other thing I was writing about. I shouldn't post this. Because it's cringe and tmi and technically I was saved from impulsively posting this. But then I read a bunch of quora posts accidentally while searching for something else yesterday and I'm honestly feeling like Aella but for entirely different reasons. Reading all of this stuff constantly.
I'm glad/not glad we're seeing the exact same thing so I know I'm not alone in this cursed bubble/timeline but she also gets an insane amount of conservatives coming at her and part of that is because of the social circles she runs in. The upper middle class white intelligentsia are all fairly sex negative now (exaggeration OK.) But also kind of support men having harems or something adjacent - Elon Musk. Or at least overlook this. On the other hand it's very difficult to build a significant following online and not be hated regardless if you are deemed imperfect in anyway. Because of how social media works.
But just the comments like this. It gets pretty insane and I notice them often:
Maybe you should stop being a degenerate hole.Also I disagree with her on a bunch of stuff. The reaction from a lot of people is still insane. But she does post a lot of controversial polls etc and I'm just immune to most of that. I also wouldn't really trust her 100% either (or anyone in that general circle,) but the people who disagree with her are more obnoxious.If being a [BEEP] makes you happy you are so damaged and beyond repair.
It seems like someone she was friends with was judging her or something inspiring a lot of tweets etc because she created some form for a gangbang for her birthday (pretty sure it's not the first time she's done this anyway lol.) This doesn't surprise me at all because I'm aware of the circles she runs in and what's been happening to them over the past several years. It's a very weird mix of people in a kind of transitory moral and cultural state. Also cult-adj. I used to talk on discord to some people who are part of that wider 'network.' Daily actually at one point. It's hard to label because there are kind of lots of vague overlapping groups. I guess 'post-rationalists.' Some people use the label 'tpot' for the people on twitter. TESCREAL. Whatever.
Many such cases. It's much crazier than the TV show Silicon Valley honestly.I am a simple lurker, but there is a peculiar right wing/reactionary contingent in tpot, which some people just kinda ignore, and I feel like it's only a matter of time before that becomes uh?tricky
It's funny that a repeated response to this is that they get these tweets every 3-6 months haha and yeah this one I stumbled on isn't the first one like this I've seen.
Oh god. That is only the tip of the iceberg.Namely, there's a somewhat prominent anti-trans person and given how transphobia gives you brainworms,,, yeah
I think it grew out of the rationalist community and neoreaction grew out of the rationalist community as well. There's a very bizarre syncretism of all these ideas and groups. If Nazi femboys exist for real they're definitely part of that lol. Like consider this article I just found:i understand you may not have been around for a very long time but tpot basically grew out of neoreactionary intellectualism. the 'contingent' you're talking about have been around for years before the label of tpot even existed
https://americanmind.org/salvo/camp-...make-soft-men/
I can't copy and paste all of it obviously but:
This article is an observation about what's happening to men.It covers a mysterious event called Vibecamp, popular among the tech elite, that was held in June in rural Maryland. Lower in profile than its nearest analogue, the annual Burning Man festival, Vibecamp is probably also more revealing when it comes to a certain coterie of high-status but directionless males. I need to say clearly that this should not be read as a condemnation of Vibecamp or the people who participate in it. I spent less than 24 hours there before allowing myself to be led away.
Plenty of think pieces lament lowering sperm counts, estrogenic microplastics, loneliness statistics, suicide rates, and atrophying vitality in the dating sphere. "What's the Matter With Men?" asks the New Yorker, "The Crisis of Men and Boys," shouts the New York Times, "Men are Lost," warns the Washington Post, "The Crisis Over American Men Is Really Code for Something Else," informs Politico, all while doing their level best to excise and alienate actual men, or at least the ones who try to act like men.
Rarely is any reporting about men done on the ground. There are barely any straight male reporters left, and the few that remain are blindly left-wing, which is to say suspicious of and upset at boys being boys. We don?t actually see what alienated, porn-addicted, feminized men look like, or how exactly the angry high-T ones get excluded and undermined. To do so would give a face to a threat--rather like, God forbid, trying to understand other people?s wrongthink.This sucks because the ?50s-?80s greatness period of American magazine reporting essentially amounted to a protracted exploration of masculinity by and about odd, unstable, and difficult men. It mapped to the same greatness period in American film. Mailer, Thompson, and Wolfe were the Coppola, Kubrick, and Friedkin of words, painting naked male aggression as an indispensable and inescapable primal force. Even the gay ones, e.g., Capote, reported back the authentic details, good or bad, in their juiciest and most honest form.I?m on the way to Vibecamp: Burning Man for nerds. There will be 800 of them, mostly men, and seemingly more transsexuals than women. The celebrity prostitute Aella will excite them on stage with frank counterfactuals about Hitler. There will be frank discussions about HBD (human bio-diversity), and frank attempts to fight, dance, and exercise. There will be horrible food. Mushroom chocolates and ketamine will be the weapons of the day.OK I was skim reading this and bunny boy wasn't what I hoped just a guy with a bunny plushie.He's part of TPOT. TPOT stands for This Part of Twitter, a designation covering the Rationalists and Effective Altruists who occupy the opposing horseshoe tong from the Dissident Right, a short but meaningful chasm between "people who care about others" and "people who care about beauty." Effective Altruists believe in extreme utilitarianism and the duty to maximize the good. They love to consider abstract calculations about the utility of starving Africa versus your morning latte. They?re drenched in therapy speak and feminized expressivism.
Several hours later, I?m drinking G&Ts and sweating and tweeting about going to Vibecamp. Bunny boy has graciously retracted the window shade so I can stare down. The fractal arteries of the Mid-Atlantic spread out below, the trees like little green broccolis. I love this part of the country. There's something American about it.The Neoreactionary cabin: a ring of bunks in a room, all but one of them full of us thought criminals, one errant Googler stuck in the last bed in the corner, next to mine. In its defense, Vibecamp does not discriminate on ideological bases--Rationalists necessarily do not believe in censorship because it undermines the fullness of information (hence the frank discussions of Hitler and HBD). On the application to attend, there was an option to select "based" as an adjective to describe yourself. I have to imagine, however, that this also came from the exiled original founder.Assuming the transsexual is a lefty/rationalist (he doesn?t really do much besides make occasional Gen Z noises and pop culture references), the group in the Jeep learns that we?re a perfectly divided foursome: two Vitalists (brainy post-right) two Rationalists (brainy post-left). The kid excitedly explains Yarvinism and I back him up, so the other two enter passive curiosity mode, retreating to short sighs of encouragement.I love that this article just finishes there. Oh my god. HE PULLED OUT KNITTING NO.On a plane on the way back, I sit next to two skinny, nerdy 20 something brunettes, a boy and a girl of almost identical pale, pimpled complexion, both with tight black masks on, the kind with additional inner white lining. They seem like they?re coming from Vibecamp, but I don?t know for sure. They don?t speak the entire flight. The second he sits down, the boy pulls out a Nintendo DS and starts playing, shoulders rigid, arms frozen at perfect right angles. He wears a black baseball cap that reads "Let the Fish Who Thinks He Knows No Fear Look Well Upon My Face,? an inside joke among fishermen and adopted by gamer nerds (it's in a Mountain Goats song). He's really clutching his DS, holding it awkwardly upright now, engrossed for hours. I wonder to myself, how long can he possibly hold the position without getting tired? Finally he slouches over, relaxes a bit, puts the game away. A relief I relax too. Maybe he's just ultra competitive, had to finish a level or something. But no. He reaches back down into his bag, digs around a bit, and pulls out his knitting.
I'm definitely picturing this tbh:
Also yeah there were lots of trans and non-binary people who came from my uni course and the other similar one too (related to game development,) it's weird how the pattern isn't just American. Also only one person was out as trans when I was at uni.
Anyway I think she has mentioned before being somewhat aware of this but obviously not enough:
idc honestly but you are too smart to feign surprise aella. you've built a life strategy on saying and doing what most people consider dumb/evil/etc. and you have your earthly rewards. you can't also act confused about why people dislike you!It's not feigned! In this case it was someone I thought was a friend. Very surprised.well then you still have a lot of updating to do. you should assume that, in the end, every single person will hate what you do with your life and your body, and it will be a miracle if there's one person who doesn't. if your rationality isn't strong enough to update on this now, and or your self-confidence is not strong enough to tolerate this likelihood, then you should have enough humility to reconsider the life you have chosen. I always thought that you knew exactly what you were doing, and were boldly prepared for the consequences, but if you are still genuinely surprised that someone hates what you?re doing with your life and body, then it seems that you?re really deeply miscalculating on the fundamentals.Oh it's that guy? (Below.) Doesn't really surprise me because again seems to be part of that social milieu. Also at some point his wife blocked me without me interacting with her at all I guess because I've responded to some of his tweets before and she didn't like what I said lol. He hasn't blocked me though.I was surprised that a friend does. Generally my friends are pretty accepting. I've been a sex worker for ten years, and the sex positive community is pretty great. Hence my surprise.
no, the gangbang responses are not public. not sure why people would lie about that. i wonder what could possibly incentivize lying about this.Since you?re blocked, here?s a screenshot of him saying how it happened
Didn't care to find out more but cared enough to tell everyoneThis has to be Aella-relatedNo it's related to the guy who was just implicatedIt's honestly this circle that made me realise how so many nerds are really just insufferable dickheads. And even my brother at one point expressed some dissatisfaction with certain types of people for similar reasons at one point a few years ago. I mean they're not all like that but there's this weird confluence of different subgroups and some of them are more sex-negative and 'pronatalist,' very judgmental. Etc.oh no it was aella related
or whatever
who cares
![]()
I randomly met her once (in a decidedly gangbangless context), and she seemed very nice. I don?t know what else to say about that whole situation.Apparently he posted this years ago:she is very nice i just wish everyone would grow up
also cranky I wasn't invited to an orgy tho
gonna just coffee and sulkIt is very funny.this actually isn't relevant at all i just thought it was funny
OK, wtf is happening in tpot?Honestly this guy sounds like he's shitposting but he blocked her and it's impossible to know:i issued a law
This actually went on for a bunch more tweets but only copied part of it.none of this would have happened if you people stopped having casual sex
im sorry but this is just good advice
im declaring a sex ban
if your married? sure. have sex with your spouse
the rest of you cannot be trusted not to hurt yourself or others
thats just how it is
it was with good reason that our ancestors outlawed tomfoolery
and be real
we have no way of effectively policing it and never will
if you want a "safe community" this is how we get it
well: i have heard the cries of the People
Lol OK.no one's more psyoped than the upper middle class and the real class war is being conducted against us by fading government organizations losing relevance and clout and trying to drag us down with them95% of weird lifestyle [BEEP] in the bay area is CIA driven and has been for more than half a century
entire city is gitd
Anyway (I wrote this yesterday. Haven't really read through it so will probably regret that at some point and I feel like it's also not thorough. This isn't talking about everything I'm into or have ever been into basically. I have this thing where if I start talking about something like this I want to include everything partly because because of some kind of completionist ocd-like thing with listing anything I like and things like that, but also partly because even if it's just a forum post on a half dead forum someone might potentially read it and if they can't form a complete accurate image of me then that might be misleading or lying almost and that's an incredibly insane way of thinking based on how insane the internet often is and also fairly narcissistic, but yeah):
I've been contemplating what the common thread in a bunch of my fetishism interests is. Obviously some are entirely related but there are some that seem to follow similar patterns.
Recently I found an audio thing where a guy is pretending he's been abducted and locked in this room where things are passed to him through some kind of hatch and then the listener is communicating with him using like a negative and affirmative beeping sound. Then he is basically conditioned gradually via this behaviour and an aphrodisiac put in his water into being a hypersexual 'camwhore' and starts to find the idea of tons of people watching him hot and does nothing but get off for others enjoyment.
So it sometimes takes me a long while to get off but this is an example of something I can get off to very quickly I'd I want to (but edging I'd better.)
Some other similar examples are guys being turned gay, women being turned into sex workers, men too really. I liked this line about a prince 'whoring himself out to common people' and he had this female Knight who his dad hired because he got robbed and he was teasing her about it and how he knew she was watching him. Then she forces him into having sex but he gets into it quickly. Too quickly to fit onto the theme I'm talking about where it's more gradual and starts with greater disgust.
I like people being feminised (don't think it's enough on it's own though without sexual stuff happening alongside,) religious people being corrupted. I like straight to bisexual/lesbian conversion stuff but it's not as arousing.
I was thinking again about the thing the transwoman was talking about with lesbian women or afab trans people being dominated by 'incel stereotype trans women' and converted to heterosexuality and trad roles and I think while that fantasy is unappealing some kind of lesbian feminisation thing which emphasises female/feminine power but with a femboy + intercourse/could be. Years ago I likes this audio where an all female goddess cult with cis women abducted this guy and pegged him and forced him to give head etc and then worship their goddess so that's the vibe so femdom basically.
Although a lot of these fantasies involve reversing power dynamics from a cultural stereotype pov - I don't like lesbian to straight or gay male to straight (ignoring that some people think trans women count as straight they don't in my head even femboys are ambiguous) - some such as the abducted guy don't and I've also liked bimbofication stuff where guys are dominant probably mostly because of the sex acts (also have an impregnation fetish) Years ago I liked this audio where a guy gets kidnapped by an all female goddess cult of cis women and then he gets pegged etc and that's the kind of vibe. Femdom basically.
Another thing I liked recently was an audio by the same person who made the goddess cult one years ago which is more based on the current culture war and this one I've used a lot over recent months. So it involves a soldier being feminised and turned into a sex slave be a female scientist I guess working for the rival army. It's implied their side are pretty much the pro-androgyny pro-feminine men side of the culture war when she says that he's the only soldier it worked on because the others believed their propaganda about men too much. It is however more malicious and a bit degrading then I personally like from a dom pov also not that into physical gender transformation really (though he kept his dick but adding breasts is irrelevant to me maybe even a slight turn off sometimes, yes I like breasts in the contexts I like them in lol not if someone is a transformed cis guy. Very particular,) but I'm not the target audience in the first place it's created for submissive guys lol.
I often think about the time Jordan Peterson complained that 'you have a sex goddess in your head and she's possessed you and you're doing her bidding' which I find offensive given my Satanic tendencies because I am God. (Kind of.) We're all God. (I don't mean that seriously but also I kind of do. I mean I would never seriously adopt anything from Christianity cause it's like Slaanesh is right there but you get me. No nobody gets me that's part of the problem.) Political discourse now is so unbelievably fucked lol and ancient. Think we're a decade away from exorcisms coming back into fashion or something.
That sentence made me lol too.We're going to talk about sex some today because that's all over the place. Desire, estrangement from, and fascination with sex today have to do with Freud?
Pops into my head a lot lol. It's very entertaining to me.It has to do with what Freud observed and Freud was correct in that sex is a dominating force. Neitzsche said every drive attempts to philosophise in it's spirit. Brilliant aphorism. He was really something and when the world collapses into materialist atheism lets say it's highly likely that sex will arise as the dominant goddess? Likely goddess. It's likely on the feminine side more accurately if you think about it historically. Now did Freud bring that about? Partly because Freud made the case that there was no metaphysical reality there were biological realities and that the prime biological reality was that of sex and so he laid some of the groundwork for some of those metaphysical claims. But to speak in Freud's defense even though he believed that sex was a dominating force it isn't clear that he believed that it should be. Now if you pushed Freud and what he thought should be the pinnacle of the moral hierarchy he would say something like the ability to work and play.
Also this is one of my special interests in general. I'm quite fascinated by everyone'satypical sexual stuff alongside my interest in androgyny. So it's as simple as undiagnosed autism I think.
In an alternate universe where I was also a genius maybe I'd do something more useful like forensic psychology or something but it seems like a bad idea for a vaguely bisexual person (Spencer Reid, Harley Quinn.) Obviously TV and comics are reality.
That video also reveals the sexual neuroticism and dislike of their own sexuality that a lot of men have. I mean most of the historical discourse about why women are evil is because they're seen as tempting them because they struggle with self control. All people have neuroticism about sex because Humans are fucking weird, but men seem more likely to have this kind of personal relationship with it. Rad fems just agree with them that male sexuality must be controlled lol. They have a complete lack of neuroticism about their own sexuality as predatory because the ideology supposes that only males can be predatory. Except whatever Germaine Greer was doing in her book about teenage boys lol.... Still no neuroticism/fear about that. And most people don't care that much about female teachers going after male students either for a similar reason.
Radfems do share the general fear and disgust a lot of masculine people have with not wanting to be sexually submissive (it's a bit more than that obviously they've been dealing with like psychopathic and manosphere type guys for generations. It's not a coincidence that many early rad fems were ex-Christians. But to reduce it to one word - fear/dislike of being submissive yeah.) What's her name... Andrea Dworkin ended up marrying a guy who identified as gay before they got together.
I find both of these viewpoints relatable because I find my own attraction damaging to other people (especially men I've worried about that more I think over the years because my general preference is for men not so much sexually but romantically I guess,) but I also dislike rightoid men (clearly lol. I'm going to keep calling them that too it describes a certain subset of right wing political manosphere people I come across often online. Not so much Jordan Peterson and Ben Shapiro who are just conservative.)
I think a lot of lesbian women think that their fear that they are predatory is somehow unique to female gynephiles and because of the historical trend of painting gynephilic women as predatory which is so weird because no not in the modern era at least. Not every guy is a dudebro and men are also portrayed as being predatory.
I think with cis men it's because they have to deal with much higher testosterone. I dunno whether trans men change to this way of thinking typically later. Some are so freaked out they just go off testosterone and become anti trans like one person who felt their sadistic impulses were out of control. (And seemed to assume that they didn't have those before taking testosterone. I'm uh very sceptical they had no idea because *gestures to my entire post* probably they just found certain thoughts more noticeable with random strangers compared to before. Because that never happens to me with random strangers on public transport or whatever.) Some commit sexual crimes, but obviously neither of those groups make up the majority of trans people who go on testosterone, and are not purely a response to going on testosterone since this doesn't happen most of the time. And at any rate trans men don't commit more crimes than cis men or trans women.
I think it's important to note the sexuality of trans and cis women commiting crimes and of all people when doing research or posting statistics. Because I doubt purely androphilic trans women commit many crimes violent or otherwise but there are more gynephilic trans women. I think like 60% in some surveys. I think androphilic trans women might have a lower rate than even cis straight women if you remove prostitution (which trans women are often involved in.) I have seen some research which points in this direction but there is very little.
My hypothesis for why this is is that firstly a lot of criminal behaviour is inspired by male competition which androphilic trans women are the most removed from (assuming they are purely androphilic results in research get messed up because of the gradations in sexuality.) Cis straight women are sexually fluid and compete with men more than androphilic trans women seem to in modern culture and straight trans women are less sexually fluid on average than cis straight women (but there are exceptions.) Cis lesbian and bisexual women have a higher crime and violent crime rate than cis straight women.
Then this is further complicated by the fact that at least in some research bisexual women and men's crime rate is higher than lesbian women and straight men respectively (despite both being more gynephilic and presumably more involved in that competition.) I think that's because people with ambiguous identities have additional complications as I've said many times now lol. So yeah you see similar patterns in some research with mixed race and non-binary people having greater poverty, mental health issues, substance abuse issues, than mono groups they overlap with, which also contribute to criminal behaviour. I think this is often explained with 'bisexual and non-binary people aren't real and crazy' but then what's going on with biracial people you know? It seems like there's a pattern there with psychological identity that nobody's bothered to research yet.
So another thing which overlaps with that competition is that I think most sexual crimes might be deviations from basic gynephilia and involve paraphilic interests that happen when people are poorly socialised and/or low status. In rare cases you get people who are androphilic and have similar fetishes that are usually directed at women but have been directed at men instead (like Jeffrey Dahmer,) but it seems to be some kind of androgynous fetish most of the time where the underlying tendency was probably originally part of gynephilia and they just start eroticising twinks or trans people or something. Sometimes this is more obvious than other times. I think even Jeffrey Dahmer often went after young guys but I don't know if it was exclusive.
Cis straight men will potentially go after teenage boys, or anyone who looks sufficiently feminine or young if they're in an environment with no cis women like prison. Also in certain cultures where it's considered a social norm. I think this is because cis straight male sexuality eroticises both femininity and neoteny.
It's obviously more complicated if you're a female gynephile or male androphile and definitely if you're bisexual... Because multiple sexualities are lumped together with different origins eg: a woman who just eroticises butch lesbians and trans men almost exclusively would probably consider herself to be a lesbian but her sexuality is most likely just a variation of androphilia with an exclusive genital preference there are some women with the same sexual preference but who are into cis guys and consider themselves to be straight. Likewise there are lesbian women who like feminine cis women and are also into femboys and straight men with the same sexuality. You could probably say most of these people are bisexual I guess. They often don't label themselves that way and I'm more interested in the underlying sexological phenomenon.
Also being sexually aroused by femme women makes sense for all women according to some evo-psych theories like how women often live in groups while guys leave for various reasons and so they get bored and lonely and interact sexually and women who don't do that might be rejected or the alternative 'harem' thing where it helped women bond in that environment. There's also the possibility that traits that don't cause issues for one sex is just shared. So female gynephilia doesn't really cause issues especially since women are less assertive and socially dominant so it wasn't selected against. This is kind of backed up by how people don't seem to take it seriously at all unlike male androphilia which is considered threatening.
There still seem to be lots of different sexual behaviours and desires with different origins and sometimes you can even have multiple at the same time. Like female gynephilic preferences alongside male gynephilic preferences (stereotypically speaking obviously. There are differences that these days people call 'male' and 'female' gaze.)
But this is just my own hypothesis based on everything I've read and I'd like to see more research exploring this especially the part about gynephilia and male competition. The stuff about fetishes and 'base sexuality' is really complicated and it's really hard to get any kind of conclusion because of how complex Human sexuality is and trying to figure out the origin of certain fetishes etc is way more difficult than simply noting if there's a correlation between certain forms of competition and gynephilia in general and criminal behaviour.
On the other hand in male + female relationships when domestic violence is initiated by just one person and not mutual it's usually the woman in the relationship. If we assume those women are straight (and they might not be, that would be interesting to research again.) This suggests that some violent behaviour is at least presently more common for women but taken less seriously because they are less physically strong.
But there are other forms of violent and sexual criminal behaviour which is still much more common for men to commit but again gynephilic men. And even though gynephilic women have a greater rate of violence etc compared to androphilic people it's still lower than gynephilic men I believe. Except the violent crime rate among prisoners is equivalent. I don't know whether that includes sexual crimes or not.
I love this song so much (imagine if I ever stayed on one topic):
A good impression
Of myself
Not much to conceal
I'm saying nothing
But I'm saying
Nothing with feel
I simply am not here
No way I...
Shut up, be happy
Stop whining, please
I'm so sad that I only got to see Porcupine Tree live once. I've seen Steven Wilson live four times as well and they sometimes play Porcupine Tree songs live but still.
It's the inefficient way people talk about this topic and the fact that it's become hugely influential in political discourse. They are focussing more on sex than sexuality and personality and I think that's a mistake.
You know like how Greta Thunberg is with the environment and climate change? Yeah this is my version of that. Except I'm not very assertive and I'm not being pushed by the mainstream media which is good for everyone else probably lol.
So back to me and my fetish(es) thing I like guys being turned into housewives maybe that's more intimate and romantic than sexual though. I liked something with a guy who was baking and then his wife has kitchen sex with him by touching him from behind. I like manual sex acts a lot. If I'm self inserting then I don't like stuff that emphasise or involves breasts. But if I can separate myself then I like breasts but it's easier visually than in fiction I've found for some weird reason. Also if it's a description like someone in a tight shirt that's fine, I've looked up photos of women with big breasts and bookmarked some photo of a woman with a t-shirt talking about her clit being pierced (ironically that was a trans woman and I don't think she'd had surgery but still hot t-shirt,) but as soon as someone starts playing with someone's breasts in a story or talking about it in audio I think about my own and dislike that. So that's weird because I don't do that with other sex acts necessarily even if the audio is talking to the listener (which it almost always is) I'm still often more voyeuristic.
Also liked this like in a story I read a while ago where the woman asks if she can be some guy's housewife scientist though the overall story was more bimbofication themed I also have a thing about nerds so that combination was weirdly hot.
Speaking of nerds I also like stuff where nerdy guys who are sexually unsuccessful dominate other people but I also like stuff where they're arrogant and get dominated by women. Nerds are traditionally low status but not really low status in modern society because our lives are kind of ruled by tech so that archetype exists in a weird ambiguous space.
The thing with a bunch of these though is that I also have clothing fetishism that get incorporated into them so that would have to be separated too like women wearing miniskirts and no underwear, glasses and various other things. I like descriptions of what people are wearing. I have this image bookmarked of a woman in short shorts that are ripped and she has a legend of Zelda tattoo.
because women aren't visual 😐
Yes I am non-binary but everything I do is as a man and a woman. These are the rules my brain decided.
So yeah the power dynamics are all over the place. I don't like people being made more masculine generally at least not sexually. Because that's seen as the default probably. There's a kind of power bottom 'oh this is your first time topping? Sort of dynamic which can be nice but again more in an affirming way then arousing. Someone becoming super jacked and shaving off their head does nothing for me. In both a fetish and everyday attraction sense but for a brief period as a teenager when my sexuality was a tad more diverse I liked the idea of people being g turned into super mutants from Fallout 3 against their will and used that as a sexual fantasy closest I've gotten to enjoying forced masc. Doesn't work for me now either. That's probably the most cis gay male fetish interest I ever had haha.
Often have fantasy themed romantic and sexual interests especially as a teenager and would come up with them myself mostly I could actually get off to daydreams till some point in my 20s.. I find it kind of comical when people blame porn/erotica when I came up with such insane stuff on my own back in the day.
I blame childhood cartoons since I was always fascinated by certain themes.
I can't really figure out why some stuff works and some stuff doesn't even if it seems to fit the theme. What is the kind of core feature is what I'm wondering or is it just pure chaos?
It feels like there's a pattern though that eludes me.